The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nuclear re-organisation of the Hoxb complex during mouse embryonic development
Open accessAbstract
The spatial and temporal co-linear expression of Hox genes during development is an exquisite example of programmed gene expression. The precise mechanisms underpinning this are not known. Analysis of Hoxbchromatin structure and nuclear organisation, during the differentiation of murine ES cells, has lent support to the idea that there is a progressive`opening' of chromatin structure propagated through Hox clusters from 3′to 5′, which contributes to the sequential activation of gene expression. Here, we show that similar events occur in vivo in at least two stages of development. The first changes in chromatin structure and nuclear organisation were detected during gastrulation in the Hoxb1-expressing posterior primitive streak region: Hoxbchromatin was decondensed and the Hoxb1 locus looped out from its chromosome territory, in contrast to non-expressing Hoxb9, which remained within the chromosome territory. At E9.5, when differential Hox expression along the anteroposterior axis is being established, we found concomitant changes in the organisation of Hoxb. Hoxb organisation differed between regions of the neural tube that had never expressed Hoxb [rhombomeres (r) 1 and 2], strongly expressed Hoxb1 but not b9 (r4), had downregulated Hoxb1 (r5), expressed Hoxb9 but not Hoxb1 (spinal cord), and expressed both genes(tail bud). We conclude that Hoxb chromatin decondensation and nuclear re-organisation is regulated in different parts of the developing embryo, and at different developmental stages. The differential nuclear organisation of Hoxb along the anteroposterior axis of the developing neural tube is coherent with co-linear Hox gene expression. In early development nuclear re-organisation is coupled to Hoxb expression,but does not anticipate it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kmita, M., van der Hoeven, F., Zákány, J., Krumlauf, R., & Duboule, D. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.2.198 · Cited by 95
Cited by
Genome Architecture: Domain Organization of Interphase Chromosomes
Bickmore, W. A., & van Steensel, B. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.001 · Cited by 725
Self-citationThe nuclear envelope and transcriptional control
Akhtar, A., & Gasser, S. M. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2122 · Cited by 441
The Spatial Organization of the Human Genome
Bickmore, W. A. (2013) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153515 · Cited by 391
Self-citationChromatin Higher-order Structure and Dynamics
Woodcock, C. L., & Ghosh, R. P. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000596 · Cited by 384
Developmental regulation of the Hox genes during axial morphogenesis in the mouse
Deschamps, J., & van Nes, J. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01897 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Chambeyron, S., Da Silva, N. R., Lawson, K. A., & Bickmore, W. A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2005-05-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2215-2223
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2140588503
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nuclear re-organisation of the Hoxb complex during mouse embryonic development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.01813
- The paper
- Chambeyron, S., Da Silva, N. R., Lawson, K. A., & Bickmore, W. A. (2005). Nuclear re-organisation of the Hoxb complex during mouse embryonic development. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.