folded gastrulation , cell shape change and the control of myosin localization
Open accessAbstract
The global cell movements that shape an embryo are driven by intricate changes to the cytoarchitecture of individual cells. In a developing embryo,these changes are controlled by patterning genes that confer cell identity. However, little is known about how patterning genes influence cytoarchitecture to drive changes in cell shape. In this paper, we analyze the function of the folded gastrulation gene (fog), a known target of the patterning gene twist. Our analysis of fog function therefore illuminates a molecular pathway spanning all the way from patterning gene to physical change in cell shape. We show that secretion of Fog protein is apically polarized, making this the earliest polarized component of a pathway that ultimately drives myosin to the apical side of the cell. We demonstrate that fog is both necessary and sufficient to drive apical myosin localization through a mechanism involving activation of myosin contractility with actin. We determine that this contractility driven form of localization involves RhoGEF2 and the downstream effector Rho kinase. This distinguishes apical myosin localization from basal myosin localization, which we find not to require actinomyosin contractility or FOG/RhoGEF2/Rho-kinase signaling. Furthermore, we demonstrate that once localized apically, myosin continues to contract. The force generated by continued myosin contraction is translated into a flattening and constriction of the cell surface through a tethering of the actinomyosin cytoskeleton to the apical adherens junctions. Our analysis of fog function therefore provides a direct link from patterning to cell shape change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Twist and Snail transcription factors play an instrumental role in controlling invagination and ventral furrow formation by regulated expression of the genes folded-gastrulation, concertina, and T48.
“Twist and Snail transcription factors play an instrumental role in controlling invagination and ventral furrow formation by regulated expression of the genes folded-gastrulation, concertina, and T48”
From Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo. (2009) · cites this paper as Dawes-Hoang et al. 2005
Cites
Müller, H. A., & Wieschaus, E. (1996) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.134.1.149 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Self-citationCox, R. T., Kirkpatrick, C., & Peifer, M. (1996) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.134.1.133 · Cited by 300 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Germline clones of this class of alleles produce sufficient levels of Arm function to enable a few eggs to complete oogenesis but subsequent function of Arm in the embryo is severely compromised and these embryos fail to assemble apical adherens junctions (Cox et al., 1996; Tolwinski and Wieschaus, 2004).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Force Generation, Transmission, and Integration during Cell and Tissue Morphogenesis
Lecuit, T., Lenne, P.-F., & Munro, E. (2011) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104027 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Cell fate coordinates mechano-osmotic forces in intestinal crypt formation
Yang, Q., Xue, S.-L., Chan, C. J., Rempfler, M., Vischi, D., Maurer-Gutierrez, F., Hiiragi, T., Hannezo, E., & Liberali, P. (2021) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-021-00700-2 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo.
Reeves, G. T., & Stathopoulos, A. (2009) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000836 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dawes-Hoang, R. E., Parmar, K. M., Christiansen, A. E., Phelps, C. B., Brand, A. H., & Wieschaus, E. F.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dawes-Hoang, Rachel E.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2005-09-15
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4165-4178
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2092245168
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5R37HD15587)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (5R37 HD 15587, R37HD015587)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Keywords
- Twist, myosin localization, cell shape changes, actomyosin contractility, RhoGEF2, Rho kinase, apical polarity, adherens junctions, cell flattening, Drosophila embryo
- MeSH terms
- Actins, Animals, Drosophila, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Models, Biological, Myosins, Signal Transduction, Cell Polarity, Cell Cycle Proteins, Body Patterning, rho GTP-Binding Proteins, Adherens Junctions, Drosophila Proteins, Cell Shape, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Twist-Related Protein 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review