The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insulin signaling promotes germline proliferation in C. elegans
Open accessAbstract
Cell proliferation must be coordinated with cell fate specification during development, yet interactions among pathways that control these two critical aspects of development are not well understood. The coordination of cell fate specification and proliferation is particularly crucial during early germline development, when it impacts the establishment of stem/progenitor cell populations and ultimately the production of gametes. In C. elegans, insulin/IGF-like receptor (IIR) signaling has been implicated in fertility, but the basis for the fertility defect had not been previously characterized. We found that IIR signaling is required for robust larval germline proliferation, separate from its well-characterized role in preventing dauer entry. IIR signaling stimulates the larval germline cell cycle. This activity is distinct from Notch signaling, occurs in a predominantly germline-autonomous manner, and responds to somatic activity of ins-3 and ins-33, genes that encode putative insulin-like ligands. IIR signaling in this role acts through the canonical PI3K pathway, inhibiting DAF-16/FOXO. However, signaling from these ligands does not inhibit daf-16 in neurons nor in the intestine, two tissues previously implicated in other IIR roles. Our data are consistent with a model in which: (1) under replete reproductive conditions, the larval germline responds to insulin signaling to ensure robust germline proliferation that builds up the germline stem cell population; and (2) distinct insulin-like ligands contribute to different phenotypes by acting on IIR signaling in different tissues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deconstructing stem cell self-renewal: genetic insights into cell-cycle regulation
Orford, K. W., & Scadden, D. T. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2269 · Cited by 851
Tissue-Specific Activities of C. elegans DAF-16 in the Regulation of Lifespan
Libina, N., Berman, J. R., & Kenyon, C. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00889-4 · Cited by 820
Tumours with PI3K activation are resistant to dietary restriction
Kalaany, N. Y., & Sabatini, D. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07782 · Cited by 468
Mutations That Increase the Life Span of C. elegans Inhibit Tumor Growth
Pinkston, J. M., Garigan, D., Hansen, M., & Kenyon, C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1121908 · Cited by 242
The search for DAF-16/FOXO transcriptional targets: Approaches and discoveries
Murphy, C. T. (2006) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2006.06.040 · Cited by 189
Cited by
Insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling in C. elegans
Murphy, C. T. (2013) · WormBook · doi:10.1895/wormbook.1.164.1 · Cited by 532
Genome-Wide Analyses Reveal a Role for Peptide Hormones in Planarian Germline Development
Collins, J. J., Hou, X., Romanova, E. V., Lambrus, B. G., Miller, C. M., Saberi, A., Sweedler, J. V., & Newmark, P. A. (2010) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000509 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Michaelson, D., Korta, D. Z., Capua, Y., & Hubbard, E. J. A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2010-02-15
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 671-680
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2017392540
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.