The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes
Open accessAbstract
Mammalian imprinted genes are associated with differentially methylated regions (DMRs) that are CpG methylated on one of the two parental chromosomes. In mice, at least 21 DMRs acquire differential methylation in the germline and many of them act as imprint centres. We previously reported the physical extents of differential methylation at 15 DMRs in mouse embryos at 12.5 days postcoitum. To reveal the ontogeny of differential methylation, we determined and compared methylation patterns of the corresponding regions in sperm and oocytes. We found that the extent of the gametic DMRs differs significantly from that of the embryonic DMRs, especially in the case of paternal gametic DMRs. These results suggest that the gametic DMR sequences should be used to extract the features specifying methylation imprint establishment in the germline: from this analysis, we noted that the maternal gametic DMRs appear as unmethylated islands in male germ cells, which suggests a novel component in the mechanism of gamete-specific marking. Analysis of selected DMRs in blastocysts revealed dynamic changes in allelic methylation in early development, indicating that DMRs are not fully protected from the major epigenetic reprogramming events occurring during preimplantation development. Furthermore, we observed non-CpG methylation in oocytes, but not in sperm, which disappeared by the blastocyst stage. Non-CpG methylation was frequently found at maternally methylated DMRs as well as non-DMR regions, suggesting its prevalence in the oocyte genome. These results provide evidence for a unique methylation profile in oocytes and reveal the surprisingly dynamic nature of DMRs in the early embryo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences
Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Dowen, R. H., Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G., Tonti-Filippini, J., Nery, J. R., Lee, L., Ye, Z., Ngo, Q.-M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08514 · Cited by 4,673
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development
Reik, W., Dean, W., & Walter, J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063443 · Cited by 3,078
CpG islands influence chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1
Thomson, J. P., Skene, P. J., Selfridge, J., Clouaire, T., Guy, J., Webb, S., Kerr, A. R. W., Deaton, A., Andrews, R., James, K. D., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08924 · Cited by 625
Orphan CpG Islands Identify Numerous Conserved Promoters in the Mammalian Genome
Illingworth, R. S., Gruenewald-Schneider, U., Webb, S., Kerr, A. R. W., James, K. D., Turner, D. J., Smith, C., Harrison, D. J., Andrews, R., & Bird, A. P. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001134 · Cited by 550
Cited by
Function and information content of DNA methylation
Schübeler, D. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14192 · Cited by 2,060
The Dynamics of Genome-wide DNA Methylation Reprogramming in Mouse Primordial Germ Cells
Seisenberger, S., Andrews, S., Krueger, F., Arand, J., Walter, J., Santos, F., Popp, C., Thienpont, B., Dean, W., & Reik, W. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.001 · Cited by 973
Self-citationThe DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos
Guo, H., Zhu, P., Yan, L., Li, R., Hu, B., Lian, Y., Yan, J., Ren, X., Lin, S., Li, J., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13544 · Cited by 913
Distribution, recognition and regulation of non-CpG methylation in the adult mammalian brain
Guo, J. U., Su, Y., Shin, J. H., Shin, J., Li, H., Xie, B., Zhong, C., Hu, S., Le, T., Fan, G., et al. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3607 · Cited by 714
Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos
Smallwood, S. A., Tomizawa, S.-I., Krueger, F., Ruf, N., Carli, N., Segonds-Pichon, A., Sato, S., Hata, K., Andrews, S. R., & Kelsey, G. (2011) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.864 · Cited by 699
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tomizawa, S.-I., Kobayashi, H., Watanabe, T., Andrews, S., Hata, K., Kelsey, G., & Sasaki, H.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 811-820
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1970488458
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.061416
- The paper
- Tomizawa, S.-I., Kobayashi, H., Watanabe, T., Andrews, S., Hata, K., Kelsey, G., & Sasaki, H. (2011). Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.061416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.