The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A study in developing visual systems with a new method of staining neurones and their processes in fixed tissue
Abstract
Carbocyanine dyes, fluorescent lipophilic substances used for optical recordings of membrane voltage and for studies of membrane fluidity, have recently been shown to provide intense and long-lasting staining of neurones in vivo and in vitro (Schwartz & Agranoff, 1981; Honig & Hume, 1985,1986; Catsicas, Thanos & Clarke, 1986; Landmesser & Honig, 1986; Thanos & Bonhoeffer, 1987). We report here that two of these dyes, dil (1,1′,dioctadecyl-3,3,3′3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate) and diO (3,3’-dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate), can also label neurones in embryonic mouse and chicken brain tissue that has been previously fixed in aldehyde fixatives. Neuronal processes and perikarya can be labelled along considerable distances in both anterograde and retrograde directions. The staining of processes and cells, including their finest extensions is smooth and clear, rivalling intracellular injections of HRP or Lucifer Yellow. The appearance and time course of progression of the staining along axons suggest that the staining in fixed tissue occurs due to a process of diffusion of dyes along the plasma membranes of cells. This technique has allowed us to study the first stages in the development of optic fibres in mouse embryos, especially at the optic chiasm. The early retinal projection (E13-E13I) is mainly crossed, but some optic fibres grow to the ipsilateral side of the brain at the outset. Retrogradely labelled ganglion cells from the dorsocentral area of the retina participate in the formation of both the ipsilateral and the contralateral projection. Thus, at early stages, crossed and uncrossed projections arise from identical subregions of the retina and the partition of the retina with respect to the laterality of its projection arises later.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain
Conturo, T. E., Lori, N. F., Cull, T. S., Akbudak, E., Snyder, A. Z., Shimony, J. S., McKinstry, R. C., Burton, H., & Raichle, M. E. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10422 · Cited by 1,774
CLARITY for mapping the nervous system
Chung, K., & Deisseroth, K. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2481 · Cited by 747
Voigt, T. (1989) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902890106 · Cited by 549
Current concepts in neuroanatomical tracing
Köbbert, C., Apps, R., Bechmann, I., Lanciego, J. L., Mey, J., & Thanos, S. (2000) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00019-8 · Cited by 417
Self-citationDNA Topoisomerase IIβ and Neural Development
Yang, X., Li, W., Prescott, E. D., Burden, S. J., & Wang, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5450.131 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Godement, P., Vanselow, J., Thanos, S., & Bonhoeffer, F.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1987-12-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 697-713
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2338813932
- Cited by
- 709
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A study in developing visual systems with a new method of staining neurones and their processes in fixed tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.101.4.697
- The paper
- Godement, P., Vanselow, J., Thanos, S., & Bonhoeffer, F. (1987). A study in developing visual systems with a new method of staining neurones and their processes in fixed tissue. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.101.4.697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.