Dominant gain-of-function mutations that lead to misregulation of the C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-14, and the evolutionary implications of dominant mutations in pattern-formation genes
Abstract
The heterochronic gene lin-14 controls the temporal sequence of developmental events in the C. elegans postembryonic cell lineage. It encodes a nuclear protein that is normally present in most somatic cells of late embryos and LI larvae but not in later larval stages or adults. Two lin-14 gain-of-function mutations cause an inappropriately high level of the lin-14 nuclear protein late in development. These mutations delete 3′ untranslated sequences from the lin-14 mRNAs and identify a negative regulatory element that controls the formation of the lin-14 protein temporal gradient. The 21 kb lin-14 gene contains 13 exons that are differentially spliced to generate two lin-14 protein products with variable N-terminal regions and a constant C-terminal region. No protein sequence similarity to any proteins in various databases was found. The temporal and cellular expression patterns of lin-14 protein accumulation is altered by mutations in the heterochronic genes lin-4 and lin-28. The lin-4 gene is required to down-regulate lin-14 protein levels during the mid-Ll stage. The lin-4 gene product could be the trans-acting factor that binds to the negative regulatory element in the lin-14 3′ untranslated region. In contrast, the lin-28 gene activity positively regulates lin-14 protein levels during early LI. Thus, these genes act antagonistically to regulate the lin-14 temporal switch. The normal down-regulation of lin-14 within 10 h of hatching is not determined by the passage of time per se, but rather is triggered when feeding induces post-embryonic development. Loss of lin-28 gene activity causes precocious down-regulation of lin-14 protein levels before feeding, whereas loss of lin-4 gene activity does not affect the level of lin-14 protein before feeding. These data suggest that to trigger the lin-14 temporal switch, the lin-4 gene is up-regulated after feeding which in turn down-regulates lin-14 via its 3’ untranslated region. We speculate on the evolutionary implications of dominant mutations in pattern-formation genes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Regulatory gene gain of function is usually a haplodominant event.
“As first pointed out by Ruvkun et al. (1991) and further discussed by ourselves (Davidson and Erwin 2009), extensive laboratory experiments show that regulatory gene gain of function is usually a haplodominant event.”
From An integrated view of precambrian eumetazoan evolution (2009) · cites this paper as Ruvkun et al. 1991
Cites
Segmental distribution of bithorax complex proteins during Drosophila development
Beachy, P. A., Helfand, S. L., & Hogness, D. S. (1985) · Nature · doi:10.1038/313545a0 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The evolutionary significance of cis-regulatory mutations
Wray, G. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2063 · Cited by 1,521 · see citing works
Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development
Peter, I. S., & Davidson, E. H. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.017 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Evolutionary innovation and stability in animal gene networks
Davidson, E. H., & Erwin, D. H. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution · doi:10.1002/jez.b.21329 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
An integrated view of precambrian eumetazoan evolution
Davidson, E. H., & Erwin, D. H. (2009) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.2009.74.042 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ruvkun, G., Wightman, B., Bürglin, T., & Arasu, P.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1991-01-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- 47-54
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1936822430
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Keywords
- lin-14, heterochronic genes, gain-of-function mutations, 3' untranslated region, negative regulatory element, lin-4, Lin28, temporal gene regulation, alternative splicing, postembryonic development, dominant mutations, Caenorhabditis elegans
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Caenorhabditis, Cell Differentiation, Biological Evolution, Gene Expression Regulation, Genes, Dominant, Models, Genetic, Morphogenesis, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review