The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Apical-basal pattern formation in the Arabidopsis embryo: studies on the role of the gnom gene
Abstract
gnom is one of several genes that make substantial contributions to pattern formation along the apical-basal axis of polarity in the Arabidopsis embryo as indicated by the mutant seedling phenotype. The apical and basal end regions of the body pattern, which include the meristems of the shoot and the root, fail to form, and a minority of mutant embryos lack morphological features of apical-basal polarity. We have investigated the developmental basis of the gnom mutant phenotype, taking advantage of a large number of EMS-induced mutant alleles. The seedling phenotype has been traced back to the early embryo in which the asymmetric division of the zygote is altered, now producing two nearly equal-sized cells. The apical daughter cell then undergoes abnormal divisions, resulting in an octant embryo with about twice the normal number of cells while the uppermost derivative of the basal cell fails to become the hypophysis, which normally contributes to root development. Consistent with this early effect, gnom appears to be epistatic to monopteros in doubly mutant embryos, suggesting that, without prior gnom activity, the monopteros gene cannot promote root and hypocotyl development. On the other hand, when root formation was induced in bisected seedlings, wild-type responded whereas gnom mutants failed to produce a root but formed callus instead. These results suggest that gnom activity promotes asymmetric cell division which we believe is necessary both for apical-basal pattern formation in the early embryo and for root formation in tissue culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Di Laurenzio, L., Wysocka-Diller, J., Malamy, J. E., Pysh, L., Helariutta, Y., Freshour, G., Hahn, M. G., Feldmann, K. A., & Benfey, P. N. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80115-4 · Cited by 1,124
Geldner, N., Anders, N., Wolters, H., Keicher, J., Kornberger, W., Muller, P., Delbarre, A., Ueda, T., Nakano, A., & Jürgens, G. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00003-5 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationPrzemeck, G. H., Mattsson, J., Hardtke, C., Sung, Z. R., & Berleth, T. (1996) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00208313 · Cited by 503
Polar auxin transport — old questions and new concepts?
Friml, J., & Palme, K. (2002) · Auxin Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0377-3_2 · Cited by 296
Mutations in the FASS gene uncouple pattern formation and morphogenesis in Arabidopsis development
Torres-Ruiz, R. A., & Jürgens, G. (1994) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.120.10.2967 · Cited by 277
Self-citationMolecular Genetic Analysis of Phototropism in Arabidopsis
Sakai, T., & Haga, K. (2012) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcs111 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayer, U., Büttner, G., & Jürgens, G.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-162
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2188155481
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.