The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Programmed cell death during Drosophila embryogenesis
Abstract
The deliberate and orderly removal of cells by programmed cell death is a common phenomenon during the development of metazoan animals. We have examined the distribution and ultrastructural appearance of cell deaths that occur during embryogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. A large number of cells die during embryonic development in Drosophila. These cells display ultrastructural features that resemble apoptosis observed in vertebrate systems, including nuclear condensation, fragmentation and engulfment by macrophages. Programmed cell deaths can be rapidly and reliably visualized in living wild-type and mutant Drosophila embryos using the vital dyes acridine orange or nile blue. Acridine orange appears to selectively stain apoptotic forms of death in these preparations, since cells undergoing necrotic deaths were not significantly labelled. Likewise, toluidine blue staining of fixed tissues resulted in highly specific labelling of apoptotic cells, indicating that apoptosis leads to specific biochemical changes responsible for the selective affinity to these dyes. Cell death begins at stage 11 (∼7 hours) of embryogenesis and thereafter becomes widespread, affecting many different tissues and regions of the embryo. Although the distribution of dying cells changes drastically over time, the overall pattern of cell death is highly reproducible for any given developmental stage. Detailed analysis of cell death in the central nervous system of stage 16 embryos (13-16 hours) revealed asymmetries in the exact number and position of dying cells on either side of the midline, suggesting that the decision to die may not be strictly predetermined at this stage. This work provides the basis for further molecular genetic studies on the control and execution of programmed cell death in Drosophila.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic control of programmed cell death in the nematode C. elegans
Ellis, H. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90004-8 · Cited by 1,828
Cited by
Programmed Cell Death in Animal Development and Disease
Fuchs, Y., & Steller, H. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.033 · Cited by 1,915
Self-citationPaumen, M. B., Ishida, Y., Muramatsu, M., Yamamoto, M., & Honjo, T. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.6.3324 · Cited by 349
Microglia Function in Central Nervous System Development and Plasticity
Schafer, D. P., & Stevens, B. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a020545 · Cited by 353
dino and mercedes , two genes regulating dorsal development in the zebrafish embryo
Hammerschmidt, M., Pelegri, F., Mullins, M. C., Kane, D. A., Eeden, F. J. M. V., Granato, M., Brand, M., Furutani-Seiki, M., Haffter, P., Heisenberg, C.-P., et al. (1996) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.123.1.95 · Cited by 323
Clearance of apoptotic and necrotic cells and its immunological consequences
Krysko, D. V., D’Herde, K., & Vandenabeele, P. (2006) · Apoptosis · doi:10.1007/s10495-006-9527-8 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Abrams, J. M., White, K., Fessler, L. I., & Steller, H.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-43
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2173390200
- Cited by
- 710
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Programmed cell death during Drosophila embryogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.117.1.29
- The paper
- Abrams, J. M., White, K., Fessler, L. I., & Steller, H. (1993). Programmed cell death during Drosophila embryogenesis. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.117.1.29
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.