Cited by 247Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Allocation of the thoracic imaginal primordia in the Drosophila embryo

Cohen, Barbara, Simcox, Amanda A., Cohen, Stephen M.·1993·Development

Abstract

The primordia of the thoracic imaginal discs of the Drosophila embryo originate as groups of cells spanning the parasegment boundary. We present evidence that the thoracic imaginal primordia are allocated in response to signals from the wingless (wg) and decapentaplegic (dpp) gene products. Rows of cells that express wg intersect rows of cells that express dpp to form a ladder-like pattern in the ectoderm of the germ band extended embryo. The imaginal primordia originate as groups of cells which lie near these intersection points. We have used a molecular probe derived from the Distal-less (Dll) gene to show that this population contains progenitor cells for both the dorsal (i.e. wing) and ventral (i.e. leg) discs. Although we show that Dll function is not required for allocation of imaginal cells, activation of an early Dll enhancer may serve as a molecular marker for allocation. A group of cells, which includes the imaginal progenitors, activate this enhancer in response to intercellular signals from wg and perhaps from dpp. We have used a conditional allele of wg to show that wg function is transiently required for both allocation of the imaginal primordia and for initiation of Dll expression in these cells during the brief interval when wg and dpp form the ladder-like pattern. Allocation of the imaginal primordium and activation of Dll expression appear to be parallel responses to a single set of positional cues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.117.2.597

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen, B., Simcox, A. A., & Cohen, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cohen, Barbara
  • Cohen, Stephen M.
Venue
Development
Published
1993-02-01
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
597-608
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2186081087
Cited by
247
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
wingless, decapentaplegic, Distal-less, Drosophila embryo, positional cues, germ band extension
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, Ectoderm, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Extremities, Genetic Markers, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Morphogenesis, Stem Cells, Wings, Animal, Gene Expression, Genes, Insect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review