The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early development and dispersal of oligodendrocyte precursors in the embryonic chick spinal cord
Abstract
Oligodendrocytes, the myelinating cells of the vertebrate CNS, originally develop from cells of the neuroepithelium. Recent studies suggest that spinal cord oligodendrocyte precursors are initially localized in the region of the ventral ventricular zone and subsequently disperse throughout the spinal cord. The characteristics of these early oligodendrocyte precursors and their subsequent migration has been difficult to assay directly in the rodent spinal cord due to a lack of appropriate reagents. In the developing chick spinal cord, we show that oligodendrocyte precursors can be specifically identified by labeling with O4 monoclonal antibody. In contrast to rodent oligodendrocyte precursors, which express O4 immunoreactivity only during the later stages of maturation, in the chick O4 immunoreactivity appears very early and its expression is retained through cellular maturation. In embryos older than stage 35, O4+ cells represent the most immature, self-renewing, cells of the chick spinal cord oligodendrocyte lineage. In the intact chick spinal cord, the earliest O4+ cells are located at the ventral ventricular zone where they actually contribute to the ventricular lining of the central canal. The subsequent migration of O4+ cells into the dorsal region of the spinal cord temporally correlates with the capacity of isolated dorsal spinal cord to generate oligodendrocytes in vitro. Biochemical analysis suggests O4 labels a POA-like antigen on the surface of chick spinal cord oligodendrocyte precursors. These studies provide direct evidence for the ventral ventricular origin of spinal cord oligodendrocytes, and suggest that this focal source of oligodendrocytes is a general characteristic of vertebrate development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noble, M., Murray, K., Stroobant, P., Waterfield, M. D., & Riddle, P. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/333560a0 · Cited by 830
Cited by
Lu, Q. R., Yuk, D.-I., Alberta, J. A., Zhu, Z., Pawlitzky, I., Chan, J., McMahon, A. P., Stiles, C. D., & Rowitch, D. H. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80897-1 · Cited by 852
Zhou, Q., Wang, S., & Anderson, D. J. (2000) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80898-3 · Cited by 789
Oligodendrocyte Development and Plasticity
Bergles, D. E., & Richardson, W. D. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a020453 · Cited by 585
Ontogeny of the human central nervous system: What is happening when?
de Graaf-Peters, V. B., & Hadders-Algra, M. (2006) · Early Human Development · doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.10.013 · Cited by 559
HDAC1 and HDAC2 regulate oligodendrocyte differentiation by disrupting the β-catenin–TCF interaction
Ye, F., Chen, Y., Hoang, T., Montgomery, R. L., Zhao, X.-H., Bu, H., Hu, T., Taketo, M. M., van Es, J. H., Clevers, H., et al. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2333 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Ono, K., Bansal, R., Payne, J., Rutishauser, U., & Miller, R. H.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1995-06-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1743-1754
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W1849466401
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.