Cited by 210Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ

wingless and patched are negative regulators of the morphogenetic furrow and can affect tissue polarity in the developing Drosophila compound eye

Ma, Chaoyong, Moses, Kevin·1995·Development

Abstract

In the developing Drosophila compound eye, a wave of pattern formation and cell-type determination sweeps across the presumptive eye epithelium. This 'morphogenetic furrow' coordinates the epithelial cells' division cycle, shape and gene expression to produce evenly spaced neural cell clusters that will eventually form the adult ommatidia. As these clusters develop, they rotate inwards to face the eye's equator and establish tissue polarity. We have found that wingless is strongly expressed in the dorsal margin of the presumptive eye field, ahead of the morphogenetic furrow. We have shown that inactivation of Wingless results in the induction of an ectopic furrow that proceeds ventrally from the dorsal margin. This ectopic furrow is normal in most respects, however the clusters formed by it fail to rotate, and we propose a two-vector model to account for normal rotation and tissue polarity in the retina. A second consequence of this inactivation of Wingless is that the dorsal head is largely deleted. We have also found that patched loss-of-function mosaic clones induce circular ectopic morphogenetic furrows (consistent with the observations of other workers with the hedgehog, and PKA genes). We use such patched induced furrows to test the two-vector model for cluster rotation and tissue polarity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.121.8.2279

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, C., & Moses, K.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Development
Published
1995-08-01
Volume
121
Issue
8
Pages
2279-2289
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W1895850272
Cited by
210
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Keywords
wingless, Patched, morphogenetic furrow, Drosophila compound eye, tissue polarity, Hedgehog signaling, PKA signaling, eye development
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, Eye, Immunohistochemistry, Insect Hormones, Membrane Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Models, Biological, Morphogenesis, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Receptors, Cell Surface, Retina, Gene Expression, Genes, Insect, In Situ Hybridization, Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate, Drosophila Proteins, Wnt1 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review