The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell determination strategies in the Drosophila eye
Abstract
Cells in the Drosophila eye are determined by inductive signalling. Here I describe a new model of eye development that explains how simple intercellular signals could specify the diverse cell types that constitute the ommatidium. This model arises from the recent observation that the Drosophila homologue of the EGF receptor (DER) is used reiteratively to trigger the differentiation of each of the cell types – successive rounds of DER activation recruit first the photoreceptors, then cone and finally pigment cells. It seems that a cell’s identity is not determined by the specific signal that induces it, but is instead a function of the state of the cell when it receives the signal. DER signalling is activated by the ligand, Spitz, and inhibited by the secreted protein, Argos. Spitz is initially produced by the central cells in the ommatidium and diffuses over a small distance. Argos has a longer range, allowing it to block more distal cells from being activated by low levels of Spitz; I have termed this interplay between a short-range activator and a long-range inhibitor ‘remote inhibition’. Since inductive signalling is common in many organisms and its components have been conserved, it is possible that the logic of signalling may also be conserved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mlodzik, M., Hiromi, Y., Weber, U., Goodman, C. S., & Rubin, G. M. (1990) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(90)90737-y · Cited by 457
Brunner, D., Dücker, K., Oellers, N., Hafen, E., Scholzi, H., & Klambt, C. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/370386a0 · Cited by 366
Schweitzer, R., Shaharabany, M., Seger, R., & Shilo, B. Z. (1995) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.9.12.1518 · Cited by 317
Spatial mechanisms of gene regulation in metazoan embryos
Davidson, E. H. (1991) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.113.1.1 · Cited by 233
Cited by
Design Principles of Insect and Vertebrate Visual Systems
Sanes, J. R., & Zipursky, S. L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.018 · Cited by 561
Sprouty, an intracellular inhibitor of Ras signaling
Casci, T., Vinós, J., & Freeman, M. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80576-0 · Cited by 467
Self-citationHigh-Intensity Raf Signal Causes Cell Cycle Arrest Mediated by p21 Cip1
Sewing, A., Wiseman, B., Lloyd, A. C., & Land, H. (1997) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.9.5588 · Cited by 462
Heterocyst Pattern Formation Controlled by a Diffusible Peptide
Yoon, H.-S., & Golden, J. W. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5390.935 · Cited by 386
Size and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects
Shingleton, A. W., Frankino, W. A., Flatt, T., Nijhout, H. F., & Emlen, D. J. (2007) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20584 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Freeman, M.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-01-15
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 261-270
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2119937553
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cell determination strategies in the Drosophila eye. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.124.2.261
- The paper
- Freeman, M. (1997). Cell determination strategies in the Drosophila eye. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124.2.261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.