The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 genes in patterning of the murine dentition
Abstract
The molecular events of odontogenic induction are beginning to be elucidated, but until now nothing was known about the molecular basis of the patterning of the dentition. A role for Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 genes in patterning of the dentition has been proposed with the genes envisaged as participating in an ‘odontogenic homeobox gene code’ by specifying molar development. This proposal was based on the restricted expression of the genes in molar ectomesenchyme derived from cranial neural crest cells prior to tooth initiation. Mice with targeted null mutations of both Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 homeobox genes do not develop maxillary molar teeth but incisors and mandibular molars are normal. We have carried out heterologous recombinations between mutant and wild-type maxillary epithelium and mesenchyme and show that the ectomesenchyme underlying the maxillary molar epithelium has lost its odontogenic potential. Using molecular markers of branchial arch neural crest (Barxl) and commitment to chondrogenic differentiation (Sox9), we show that this population alters its fate from odontogenic to become chondrogenic. These results provide evidence that a subpopulation of cranial neural crest is specified as odontogenic by Dlx-1 and Dlx-2 genes. Loss of function of these genes results in reprogramming of this population of ectomesenchyme cells into chondrocytes. This is the first indication that the development of different shaped teeth at different positions in the jaws is determined by independent genetic pathways.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bitgood, M. J., & McMahon, A. P. (1995) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.1995.0010 · Cited by 1,370
Cited by
Aryl hydrocarbon receptors: diversity and evolution
Hahn, M. E. (2002) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/s0009-2797(02)00070-4 · Cited by 642
Mechanisms of ectodermal organogenesis.
Pispa, J., & Thesleff, I. (2003) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00325-7 · Cited by 499
Transformation of Tooth Type Induced by Inhibition of BMP Signaling
Tucker, A. S., Matthews, K. L., & Sharpe, P. T. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5391.1136 · Cited by 447
Self-citationMaking a tooth: growth factors, transcription factors, and stem cells
ZHANG, Y. D., CHEN, Z., SONG, Y. Q., LIU, C., & CHEN, Y. P. (2005) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/sj.cr.7290299 · Cited by 313
Hassan, M. Q., Javed, A., Morasso, M. I., Karlin, J., Montecino, M., van Wijnen, A. J., Stein, G. S., Stein, J. L., & Lian, J. B. (2004) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.24.20.9248-9261.2004 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, B. L., Tucker, A. S., Qiu, M., Ferguson, C. A., Hardcastle, Z., Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Sharpe, P. T.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-12-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4811-4818
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2184681883
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.