The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate
Abstract
We have investigated the role of the Notch and Wingless signaling pathways in the maintenance of wing margin identity through the study of cut, a homeobox-containing transcription factor and a late-arising margin-specific marker. By late third instar, a tripartite domain of gene expression can be identified about the dorsoventral compartment boundary, which marks the presumptive wing margin. A central domain of cut- and wingless-expressing cells are flanked on the dorsal and ventral side by domains of cells expressing elevated levels of the Notch ligands Delta and Serrate. We show first that cut acts to maintain margin wingless expression, providing a potential explanation of the cut mutant phenotype. Next, we examined the regulation of cut expression. Our results indicate that Notch, but not Wingless signaling, is autonomously required for cut expression. Rather, Wingless is required indirectly for cut expression; our results suggest this requirement is due to the regulation by wingless of Delta and Serrate expression in cells flanking the cut and wingless expression domains. Finally, we show that Delta and Serrate play a dual role in the regulation of cut and wingless expression. Normal, high levels of Delta and Serrate can trigger cut and wingless expression in adjacent cells lacking Delta and Serrate. However, high levels of Delta and Serrate also act in a dominant negative fashion, since cells expressing such levels cannot themselves express cut or wingless. We propose that the boundary of Notch ligand along the normal margin plays a similar role as part of a dynamic feedback loop that maintains the tripartite pattern of margin gene expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Notch Signaling: Cell Fate Control and Signal Integration in Development
Artavanis-Tsakonas, S., Rand, M. D., & Lake, R. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5415.770 · Cited by 5,909
Bray, S. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.94 · Cited by 1,012
Notch signaling: simplicity in design, versatility in function
Andersson, E. R., Sandberg, R., & Lendahl, U. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.063610 · Cited by 950
A Ligand-Induced Extracellular Cleavage Regulates γ-Secretase-like Proteolytic Activation of Notch1
Mumm, J. S., Schroeter, E. H., Saxena, M. T., Griesemer, A., Tian, X., Pan, D. J., Ray, W. J., & Kopan, R. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80416-5 · Cited by 853
Identification of Drosophila MicroRNA Targets
Stark, A., Brennecke, J., Russell, R. B., & Cohen, S. M. (2003) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000060 · Cited by 784
Metadata
- Authors
- Micchelli, Rulifson, E. J., & Blair, S. S.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-04-15
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1485-1495
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2149008219
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/dev.124.8.1485
- The paper
- Micchelli, Rulifson, E. J., & Blair, S. S. (1997). The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124.8.1485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.