The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Somite number and vertebrate evolution
Abstract
Variation in segment number is an important but neglected feature of vertebrate evolution. Some vertebrates have as few as six trunk vertebrae, while others have hundreds. We examine this phenomenon in relation to recent models of evolution and development. Surprisingly, differences in vertebral number are foreshadowed by different somite counts at the tailbud stage, thought to be a highly conserved (phylotypic) stage. Somite number therefore violates the ‘developmental hourglass’ model. We argue that this is because somitogenesis shows uncoupling or dissociation from the conserved positional field encoded by genes of the zootype. Several other systems show this kind of dissociation, including limbs and feathers. Bmp-7 expression patterns demonstrate dissociation in the chick pharyngeal arches. This makes it difficult to recognise a common stage of pharyngeal development or ‘pharyngula’ in all species. Rhombomere number is more stable during evolution than somite number, possibly because segmentation and positional specification in the hindbrain are relatively interdependent. Although developmental mechanisms are strongly conserved, dissociation allows at least some major evolutionary changes to be generated in phylotypic stages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The zootype and the phylotypic stage
Slack, J. M. W., Holland, P. W. H., & Graham, C. F. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361490a0 · Cited by 699
Cited by
Oates, A. C., Morelli, L. G., & Ares, S. (2012) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.063735 · Cited by 388
Heterochrony revisited: the evolution of developmental sequences
Smith, K. K. (2001) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bijl.2001.0535 · Cited by 294
Chapter 9 Hox Genes and Vertebrate Axial Pattern
Wellik, D. M. (2009) · Current Topics in Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/s0070-2153(09)88009-5 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, M. K., Allen, S. P., Wright, G. M., Raynaud, A., & Hanken, J.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1998-01-15
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-160
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2189626223
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.