Cited by 118Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationRenal and related cancers

C. elegans POP-1/TCF functions in a canonical Wnt pathway that controls cell migration and in a noncanonical Wnt pathway that controls cell polarity

Herman, Michael A.·2001·Development

Abstract

In Caenorhabditis elegans, Wnt signaling pathways are important in controlling cell polarity and cell migrations. In the embryo, a novel Wnt pathway functions through a (beta)-catenin homolog, WRM-1, to downregulate the levels of POP-1/Tcf in the posterior daughter of the EMS blastomere. The level of POP-1 is also lower in the posterior daughters of many anteroposterior asymmetric cell divisions during development. I have found that this is the case for of a pair of postembryonic blast cells in the tail. In wild-type animals, the level of POP-1 is lower in the posterior daughters of the two T cells, TL and TR. Furthermore, in lin-44/Wnt mutants, in which the polarities of the T cell divisions are frequently reversed, the level of POP-1 is frequently lower in the anterior daughters of the T cells. I have used a novel RNA-mediated interference technique to interfere specifically with pop-1 zygotic function and have determined that pop-1 is required for wild-type T cell polarity. Surprisingly, none of the three C. elegans (beta)-catenin homologs appeared to function with POP-1 to control T cell polarity. Wnt signaling by EGL-20/Wnt controls the migration of the descendants of the QL neuroblast by regulating the expression the Hox gene mab-5. Interfering with pop-1 zygotic function caused defects in the migration of the QL descendants that mimicked the defects in egl-20/Wnt mutants and blocked the expression of mab-5. This suggests that POP-1 functions in the canonical Wnt pathwa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.128.4.581

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Herman, M. A.
Affiliations
Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Herman, Michael A.
Venue
Development
Published
2001-02-15
Volume
128
Issue
4
Pages
581-590
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2119754934
Cited by
118
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 56339)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Renal and related cancers
Keywords
Wnt signaling, canonical Wnt pathway, non-canonical Wnt pathway, cell polarity, cell migration, Hox gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Movement, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Glycoproteins, High Mobility Group Proteins, Mutation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, RNA, Tail, Transcription Factors, Zygote, Signal Transduction, Cell Polarity, Caenorhabditis elegans, Genes, Reporter, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Cell Lineage, Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins, Zebrafish Proteins, Wnt Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review