The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overexpression of Snail family members highlights their ability to promote chick neural crest formation
Open accessAbstract
The Snail gene family of transcription factors plays crucial roles in different morphogenetic processes during the development of vertebrate and invertebrate embryos. In previous studies of function interference for one of the family members, Slug, we showed its involvement and neural crest formation in the chick embryo. Now we have carried out a series of gain-of-function experiments in which we show that Slug overexpression in the neural tube of the chick embryo induces an increase in neural crest production. The analysis of electroporated embryos shows that Slug can induce the expression of rhoB and an increase in the number of HNK-1-positive migratory cells, indicating that it lies upstream of them in the genetic cascade of neural crest development. The increase in neural crest production after Slug overexpression was confined to the cranial region, indicating that the mechanisms of crest induction somehow differ between head and trunk. The expression of the two vertebrate family members, Slug and Snail, is peculiar with respect to the neural crest. Slug is not expressed in the premigratory crest in the mouse, whereas it is expressed in this cell population in the chick and the opposite is true for Snail(Sefton, M., Sánchez, S. and Nieto M. A. (1998) Development125, 3111-3121). This raises the question of whether they can be functionally equivalent. To test this hypothesis both intra- and interspecies, we have performed a series of ectopic expression experiments by electroporating chick and mouse Snail in the chick embryo hindbrain. We observe that both genes elicit the same responses in the neural tube. Our results indicate that they can be functionally equivalent, although the embryos show a higher response to the endogenous gene, chick Slug.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Crest and the Origin of Vertebrates: A New Head
Gans, C., & Northcutt, R. G. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.220.4594.268 · Cited by 1,053
Cited by
Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transitions in Development and Disease
Thiery, J. P., Acloque, H., Huang, R. Y. J., & Nieto, M. A. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007 · Cited by 9,931
Self-citationSignaling mechanisms of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition
Gonzalez, D. M., & Medici, D. (2014) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2005189 · Cited by 1,721
The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors
Nieto, M. A. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm757 · Cited by 1,719
Self-citationEpithelial-mesenchymal transitions: insights from development
Lim, J., & Thiery, J. P. (2012) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.071209 · Cited by 661
Neural crest development is regulated by the transcription factor Sox9
Cheung, M., & Briscoe, J. (2003) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.00808 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- del Barrio, M. G., & Nieto, M. A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1583-1593
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2113558048
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.