Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An investigation of inner cell mass and trophoblast tissues following their isolation from the mouse blastocyst

Gardner, R. L., Johnson, M. H.·1972·Development

Abstract

Inner cell mass (ICM) and trophoblast were isolated from -day post-coitum mouse blastocysts by microsurgery. Trophoblastic fragments formed vesicles in culture but did not aggregate with other such fragments. They proved as effective as intact blastocysts in inducing decidua in recipient uteri, but thereafter failed to proliferate. Isolated ICMs remained as solid balls of cells that readily aggregated in pairs or groups in culture but failed to induce implantation changes in receptive uteri. Possible explanations for the failure of isolated trophoblast to proliferate after implantation are discussed. It is argued that presence of ICM tissue is necessary for trophoblast proliferation, and suggested that the ICM exerts its effect by controlling development of the ectoplacental cone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/dev.28.2.279

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gardner, R. L., & Johnson, M. H.
Venue
Development
Published
1972-10-01
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
279-312
ISSN
  • 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9129
OpenAlex
W2110310104
Cited by
198
References
0
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.