Cited by 64Reproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Physiology in LivestockReproductive System and Pregnancy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EMBRYONIC MORTALITY DURING THE PRE- AND POST-IMPLANTATION PERIODS OF PREGNANCY IN MATURE MICE AFTER SUPEROVULATION

Open access
BEAUMONT, HEATHER M., SMITH, AGNES F.·1975·Reproduction

Abstract

Summary.: Sexually mature mice were stimulated to superovulate by giving exogenous gonadotrophins at known stages of the oestrous cycle. Untreated animals which ovulated spontaneously served as controls. The number of oocytes ovulated by each female was estimated from counts of the number of CL of pregnancy, and the incidence of embryonic mortality during the pre- and post-implantation stages of pregnancy was assessed from the number of zygotes recovered from the reproductive tract at 2·0 and 4·0 days post coitum and of conceptuses examined at 7·5 and 11·5 days post coitum. The mean number of oocytes ovulated by treated animals was 39·54, compared with 12·80 in controls: in mice which had superovulated, 44% of the ova were lost before implantation compared with about 10% in the controls. Further losses occurred about the time of implantation and at mid-pregnancy and thus the number of embryos classified as normal rarely exceeded the maximum found in controls. Death at mid-pregnancy seemed to be preceded by developmental retardation. The possibility that genetic and environmental factors play a role in embryonic loss after superovulation is discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/jrf.0.0450437

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Snell,J. & Stevens, L. (1966) Early embryology. In Biology ofthe Laboratory Mouse, Ch. 12. pp. 205-245.
  2. Ed. E. L. Green. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
BEAUMONT, H. M., & SMITH, A. F.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Reproduction
Published
1975-12-01
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
437-448
ISSN
  • 1470-1626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-7899
OpenAlex
W2041647799
Cited by
64
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
embryonic mortality, superovulation, gonadotropins, oocyte loss, implantation, estrous cycle, developmental delay, conceptus, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Count, Corpus Luteum, Female, Fetal Death, Ovulation, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Animal, Superovulation, Time Factors, Uterus, Embryo Loss, Embryonic Development, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review