The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regeneration and pattern formation in planarians I. The pattern of mitosis in anterior and posterior regeneration in Dugesia (G) tigrina, and a new proposal for blastema formation
Abstract
Mitotic activity during regeneration in the planarian Dugesia (G) tigrina shows a biphasic pattern, with a first maximum at 4–12 h, a second and higher maximum at 2–4 days, and a relative minimum in between. The first peak is mainly due to pre-existing G2 cells entering mitosis shortly after cutting, whereas the second maximum is due to cells that divide after going through the S period from the onset of regeneration. From a spatial point of view, the highest mitotic values are found in stump (postblastema) regions near the wound (0–300 μm), though regions far from it also show increased mitotic values but always lower overall values. As regeneration continues the postblastema maximum shifts slightly to more proximal regions. In contrast, no mitosis has been found within the blastema, even though the number of blastema cells increases steadily during regeneration. These results suggest that blastema in planarians forms through an early accumulation of undifferentiated cells at the wound boundary, and grows by the continuous local migration of new undifferentiated cells from the stump to the base of blastema. The results obtained demonstrate that blastema formation in planarians occurs through mechanisms somewhat different to those shown to occur in the classical epimorphic models of regeneration (Annelida, Insecta, Amphibia), and suggest that planarian regeneration could represent an intermediate stage between morphallactic and epimorphic modalities of regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cebrià, F., & Newmark, P. A. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.01941 · Cited by 286
Gurley, K. A., Elliott, S. A., Simakov, O., Schmidt, H. A., Holstein, T. W., & Alvarado, A. S. (2010) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.08.007 · Cited by 212
Lack of p21 expression links cell cycle control and appendage regeneration in mice
Bedelbaeva, K., Snyder, A., Gourevitch, D., Clark, L., Zhang, X.-M., Leferovich, J., Cheverud, J. M., Lieberman, P., & Heber-Katz, E. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000830107 · Cited by 207
Vogg, M. C., Owlarn, S., Pérez Rico, Y. A., Xie, J., Suzuki, Y., Gentile, L., Wu, W., & Bartscherer, K. (2014) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.03.016 · Cited by 101
Hayashi, T., Motoishi, M., Yazawa, S., Itomi, K., Tanegashima, C., Nishimura, O., Agata, K., & Tarui, H. (2011) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.060194 · Cited by 58
Cellular and Molecular Responses Unique to Major Injury Are Dispensable for Planarian Regeneration
Tewari, A. G., Stern, S. R., Oderberg, I. M., & Reddien, P. W. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.004 · Cited by 51
Effects of neuropeptide F on regeneration in Girardia tigrina (Platyhelminthes)
Kreshchenko, N. D., Sedelnikov, Z., Sheiman, I. M., Reuter, M., Maule, A. G., & Gustafsson, M. K. S. (2008) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-007-0519-y · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Saló, E., & Baguñà, J.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1984-10-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-80
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2274021321
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.