Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The nuclear receptor superfamily

Robinson-Rechavi, Marc, Garcia, Hector Escriva, Laudet, Vincent·2003·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

Nuclear receptors are one of the most abundant classes of transcriptional regulators in animals (metazoans). They regulate diverse functions, such as homeostasis, reproduction, development and metabolism (for a review, seeLaudet and Gronemeyer, 2002). Nuclear hormone receptors function as ligand-activated transcription factors,and thus provide a direct link between signaling molecules that control these processes and transcriptional responses. A large number of nuclear receptors have been identified through sequence similarity to known receptors, but have no identified natural ligand, and are referred to as `nuclear orphan receptors'. As nuclear receptors bind small molecules that can easily be modified by drug design, and control functions associated with major diseases(e.g. cancer, osteoporosis and diabetes), they are promising pharmacological targets. The search for ligands for orphan receptors and the identification of novel signaling pathways has become a very active research field(Gustafsson, 1999;Kliewer et al., 1999).FIG1Nuclear receptors share a common structural organization. The N-terminal region (A/B domain) is highly variable, and contains at least one constitutionally active transactivation region (AF-1) and several autonomous transactivation domains (AD); A/B domains are variable in length, from less than 50 to more than 500 amino acids, and their 3D structure is not known. The most conserved region is the DNA-binding domain (DBD, C domain), which notably contains the P-box, a short motif responsible for DNA-binding specificity on sequences typically containing the AGGTCA motif, and is involved in dimerization of nuclear receptors. This dimerization includes homodimers as well as heterodimers. The 3D structure of the DBD has been resolved for a number of nuclear receptors and contains two highly conserved zinc-fingers— C-X2-C-X13-C-X2-C and C-X5-C-X9-C-X2-C — the four cysteines of each finger chelating one Zn2+ ion. The structure represented shows the DBD of the human glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding to DNA(Hard et al., 1990). Between the DNA-binding and ligand-binding domains is a less conserved region (D domain) that behaves as a flexible hinge between the C and E domains, and contains the nuclear localization signal (NLS), which may overlap on the C domain. The largest domain is the moderately conserved ligand-binding domain(LBD, E domain), whose secondary structure of 12 α-helixes is better conserved than the primary sequence. The 3D structure has been determined for several nuclear receptors (reviewed byMoras and Gronemeyer, 1998),unliganded (apo) or liganded (holo), allowing much better understanding of the mechanisms involved in ligand binding. We show the LBD of RXRα in apo form (Bourguet et al., 1995)and in holo form with its natural ligand 9-cis retinoic acid(Egea et al., 2000) (figures courtesy of Jean-Marie Wurtz, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch, France). The E domain is responsible for many functions, mostly ligand induced, notably the AF-2 transactivation function, a strong dimerization interface, another NLS, and often a repression function. Nuclear receptors may or may not contain a final domain in the C-terminus of the E domain, the F domain, whose sequence is extremely variable and whose structure and function are unknown.Nuclear receptors form a superfamily of phylogenetically related proteins,with 21 genes in the complete genome of the fly Drosophila melanogaster (Adams et al.,2000), 48 in humans(Robinson-Rechavi et al.,2001) [but one more, FXRβ, in the mouse(Robinson-Rechavi and Laudet,2003)] and, unexpectedly, more than 270 genes in the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans (Sluder et al., 1999). This diversity has been organized in a phylogeny-based nomenclature (Nuclear Receptors Nomenclature Committee, 1999) of the form NRxyz, where x is the sub-family, y is the group and z the gene. In addition to nuclear receptors that have both DNA-binding and ligand-binding domains, sub-family NR0 contains weird nuclear receptors that lack either of these domains, and are not represented in the phylogenetic tree. They include notably Knirps, KNRL and EGON (NR0A1, 2, 3) in Drosophila, and DAX1 and SHP (NR0B1, 2) in vertebrates.The superfamily includes receptors for hydrophobic molecules such as steroid hormones (e.g. estrogens, glucocorticoids, progesterone,mineralocorticoids, androgens, vitamin D3, ecdysone, oxysterols and bile acids), retinoic acids (all-trans and 9-cis isoforms), thyroid hormones, fatty acids, leukotrienes and prostaglandins(Escriva et al., 2000;Laudet and Gronemeyer, 2002). RXRs (USP in arthropods, indicated by a red dot in the phylogeny) play a central role in dimerization of nuclear receptors, and we have indicated its partners by a red star in the phylogenetic tree (for a review, seeLaudet and Gronemeyer, 2002);the stars with a question mark indicate the controversial description of hetero-dimerization of COUP-T

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.00247

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
Robinson-Rechavi, M., Garcia, H. E., & Laudet, V.
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
2003-02-15
Volume
116
Issue
4
Pages
585-586
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W1505090413
Cited by
587
References
1
FWCI
13.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The nuclear receptor superfamily. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.00247
The paper
Robinson-Rechavi, M., Garcia, H. E., & Laudet, V. (2003). The nuclear receptor superfamily. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00247

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.