Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chromatin loops are selectively anchored using scaffold/matrix-attachment regions

Heng, Henry H. Q., Goetze, Sandra, Ye, Christine J., Liu, Guo, Stevens, Joshua B., Bremer, Steven W., Wykes, Susan M., Bode, Juergen, Krawetz, Stephen A.·2004·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

The biological significance of nuclear scaffold/matrix-attachment regions (S/MARs) remains a topic of long-standing interest. The key to understanding S/MAR behavior relies on determining the physical attributes of in vivo S/MARs and whether they serve as rigid or flexible chromatin loop anchors. To analyze S/MAR behavior, single and multiple copies of the S/MAR-containing constructs were introduced into various host genomes of transgenic mice and transfected cell lines. These in vivo integration events provided a system to study the association and integration patterns of each introduced S/MAR. By utilizing FISH to visualize directly the localization of S/MARs on the nuclear matrix or chromatin loop, we were able to assign specific attributes to the S/MAR. Surprisingly, when multiple-copy S/MARs were introduced they were selected and used as nuclear matrix anchors in a discriminatory manner, even though they all contained identical primary sequences. This selection process was probably mediated by S/MAR availability including binding strength and copy number, as reflected by the expression profiles and association of multi-copy tandem inserted constructs. Whereas S/MARs functioned as the mediators of loop attachment, they were used in a selective and dynamic fashion. Consequently, S/MAR anchors were necessary but not sufficient for chromatin loops to form. These observations reconcile many seemingly contradictory attributes previously associated with S/MARs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.00976

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Repeat-induced gene silencing in mammals

    Garrick, D., Fiering, S., Martin, D. I. K., & Whitelaw, E. (1998) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0198-56 · Cited by 887 · cited 1×

    “Short tandem repeated arrays of transgene have been reported to form heterochromatin and silence gene expression (Henikoff, 1998; Garrick et al., 1998).”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 204

Metadata

Authors
Heng, H. H. Q., Goetze, S., Ye, C. J., Liu, G., Stevens, J. B., Bremer, S. W., Wykes, S. M., Bode, J., & Krawetz, S. A.
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
117
Issue
7
Pages
999-1008
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W2167578708
Cited by
204
References
1
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromatin loops are selectively anchored using scaffold/matrix-attachment regions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.00976
The paper
Heng, H. H. Q., Goetze, S., Ye, C. J., Liu, G., Stevens, J. B., Bremer, S. W., Wykes, S. M., Bode, J., & Krawetz, S. A. (2004). Chromatin loops are selectively anchored using scaffold/matrix-attachment regions. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00976

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.