Cited by 890Animal Genetics and ReproductionEpigenetics and DNA MethylationChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Repeat-induced gene silencing in mammals

Garrick, David, Fiering, Steven, Martin, David I.K., Whitelaw, Emma·1998·Nature Genetics

Abstract

In both plants and Drosophila melanogaster, expression from a transgenic locus may be silenced when repeated transgene copies are arranged as a concatameric array. This repeat-induced gene silencing is frequently manifested as a decrease in the proportion of cells that express the transgene, resulting in a variegated pattern of expression. There is also some indication that, in transgenic mammals, the number of transgene copies within an array can exert a repressive influence on expression, with several mouse studies reporting a decrease in the level of expression per copy as copy number increases. However, because these studies compare different sites of transgene integration as well as arrays with different numbers of copies, the expression levels observed may be subject to varying position effects as well as the influence of the multicopy array. Here we describe use of the lox/Cre system of site-specific recombination to generate transgenic mouse lines in which different numbers of a transgene are present at the same chromosomal location, thereby eliminating the contribution of position effects and allowing analysis of the effect of copy number alone on transgene silencing. Reduction in copy number results in a marked increase in expression of the transgene and is accompanied by decreased chromatin compaction and decreased methylation at the transgene locus. These findings establish that the presence of multiple homologous copies of a transgene within a concatameric array can have a repressive effect upon gene expression in mammalian systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng0198-56

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrick, D., Fiering, S., Martin, D. I. K., & Whitelaw, E.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
1998-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
56-59
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2065189089
Cited by
887
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 41
FWCI
36.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
transgene copy number, transgene silencing, position effect, transgenic mice, chromatin condensation, DNA methylation, epigenetic silencing
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromatin, Erythrocytes, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Lac Operon, Male, Mammals, Mice, Transgenic, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Transcription, Genetic, Viral Proteins, Gene Dosage, Transgenes, Integrases, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review