Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 494

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Death receptor signaling

Lavrik, Inna, Golks, Alexander, Krammer, Peter H.·2005·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

Apoptosis or programmed cell death is a common property of multicellular organisms (Danial and Korsmeyer, 2004; Krammer, 2000). It can be triggered by a number of factors, including UV- or γ-irradiation, chemotherapeutic drugs or signaling by death receptors (DR). The DR family is part of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (Bhardwaj and Aggarwal, 2003). Triggering members of the DR family by death ligands results in the transduction of either apoptotic or survival signals. The poster shows a general overview of DR signaling, summarizing the molecules and pathways involved.Eight members of the death receptor family have been characterized so far: tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1; also known as DR1, CD120a, p55 and p60), CD95 (also known as DR2, APO-1 and Fas), DR3 (also known as APO-3, LARD, TRAMP and WSL1), TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1 (TRAILR1; also known as DR4 and APO-2), TRAILR2 (also known as DR5, KILLER and TRICK2), DR6, ectodysplasin A receptor (EDAR) and nerve growth factor receptor (NGFR) (French and Tschopp, 2003; Wajant, 2003). These are distinguished by a cytoplasmic region of ∼80 residues termed the death domain (DD). When these receptors are triggered by corresponding ligands, a number of molecules are recruited to the DD and subsequently a signaling cascade is activated. Death ligands also interact with decoy receptors (DcRs) that do not possess DDs and so cannot form signaling complexes. To date, four decoy receptors have been characterized: TRAILR3 (also known as DcR1), TRAILR4 (also known as DcR2), DcR3 and osteoprotegrin (OPG).FIG1Two types of DR signaling complex can be distinguished. The first group comprises the death-inducing signaling complexes (DISCs) that are formed at the CD95 receptor, TRAILR1 or TRAILR2 (Peter and Krammer, 2003). All three receptors recruit DISCs with similar compositions. DISC formation results in the activation of caspase-8, which plays the central role in transduction of the apoptotic signal. The second group comprises the TNFR1, DR3, DR6 and EDAR. These recruit a different set of molecules, which transduce both apoptotic and survival signals.CD95 and TRAILR1/TRAILR2 DISCs consist of oligomerized, probably trimerized, receptors, the DD-containing adaptor molecule FADD (Fas-Associated Death Domain), two isoforms of procaspase-8 (procaspase-8/a and procaspase-8/b), procaspase-10 and the cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (FLIPL/S) (Peter and Krammer, 2003). The interactions between the molecules at the DISC are based on homotypic contacts. The DD of the receptor interacts with the DD of FADD whereas the death effector domain (DED) of FADD interacts with the N-terminal tandem DEDs of procaspase-8, procaspase-10 and FLIPL/S. Activation of procaspase-8 is believed to follow an `induced proximity' model, in which high local concentrations of procaspase-8 at the DISC lead to its autoproteolytic activation, a multi-step cleavage process resulting in formation of a caspase-8 heterotetramer containing two large subunits (p18) and two small subunits (p10). This is then released into the cytosol to propagate the apoptotic signal.Procaspase-10 is also activated at the DISC, forming an active heterotetramer (Sprick et al., 2002). However, whether caspase-10 can trigger cell death in absence of caspase-8 in response to CD95 or TRAILR1/R2 stimulation is controversial. Thus, the role of caspase-10 remains elusive.FLIPL and FLIPS inhibit activation of procaspase-8 at the DISC by blocking its processing. There is increasing evidence that FLIPL also facilitates the cleavage of procaspase-8 at the DISC by forming FLIPL-procaspase-8 heterodimers (Chang et al., 2003; Micheau et al., 2002). A detailed understanding of FLIP action at the DISC requires further studies.Besides the above-mentioned components of the DISC, a number of molecules have been reported to be recruited to the DISC by direct interaction with DISC proteins (Daxx, FAP-1, FLASH, RIP, FAF-1 and others). The roles of many of these proteins are unclear (Peter and Krammer, 2003).Two types of CD95 signaling have been established. Type I cells are characterized by high levels of DISC formation and increased amounts of active caspase-8. Activated caspase-8 directly leads to the activation of downstream effector caspases. In type II cells, there are lower levels of CD95 DISC formation and, thus, lower levels of active caspase-8 (Scaffidi et al., 1998). In this case, signaling requires an additional amplification loop that involves the cleavage by caspase-8 of the Bcl-2-family protein Bid to generate truncated (t) Bid and subsequent tBid-mediated release of cytochrome c (Cyt c) from mitochondria. The release of Cyt c from mitochondria results in apoptosome formation, followed by the activation of procaspase-9, which in turn cleaves downstream effector caspases (Korsmeyer et al., 2000). Type II CD95 signaling might be blocked by Bcl-2 family members such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL (Willis et al.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.01610

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 494

Metadata

Authors
Lavrik, I., Golks, A., & Krammer, P. H.
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
2005-01-15
Volume
118
Issue
2
Pages
265-267
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W2124489451
Cited by
494
References
3
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Death receptor signaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.01610
The paper
Lavrik, I., Golks, A., & Krammer, P. H. (2005). Death receptor signaling. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01610

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.