The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation
Open accessAbstract
Transcriptional regulation contributes to the maintenance of pluripotency, self-renewal and differentiation in embryonic cells and in stem cells. Therefore, control of gene expression at the level of transcription is crucial for embryonic development, as well as for organogenesis, functional adaptation, and regeneration in adult tissues and organs. In the past, most work has focused on how transcriptional regulation results from the complex interplay between chemical cues, adhesion signals, transcription factors and their co-regulators during development. However, chemical signaling alone is not sufficient to explain how three-dimensional (3D) tissues and organs are constructed and maintained through the spatiotemporal control of transcriptional activities. Accumulated evidence indicates that mechanical cues, which include physical forces (e.g. tension, compression or shear stress), alterations in extracellular matrix (ECM) mechanics and changes in cell shape, are transmitted to the nucleus directly or indirectly to orchestrate transcriptional activities that are crucial for embryogenesis and organogenesis. In this Commentary, we review how the mechanical control of gene transcription contributes to the maintenance of pluripotency, determination of cell fate, pattern formation and organogenesis, as well as how it is involved in the control of cell and tissue function throughout embryogenesis and adult life. A deeper understanding of these mechanosensitive transcriptional control mechanisms should lead to new approaches to tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 · Cited by 13,915
Geometric Control of Cell Life and Death
Chen, C. S., Mrksich, M., Huang, S., Whitesides, G. M., & Ingber, D. E. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5317.1425 · Cited by 4,657
Self-citationCell Shape, Cytoskeletal Tension, and RhoA Regulate Stem Cell Lineage Commitment
McBeath, R., Pirone, D. M., Nelson, C. M., Bhadriraju, K., & Chen, C. S. (2004) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(04)00075-9 · Cited by 4,180
Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation
Wolpert, L. (1969) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(69)80016-0 · Cited by 3,050
Mechanotransduction Across the Cell Surface and Through the Cytoskeleton
Wang, N., Butler, J. P., & Ingber, D. E. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7684161 · Cited by 3,003
Self-citationElucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals
Dong, J., Feldmann, G., Huang, J., Wu, S., Zhang, N., Comerford, S. A., Gayyed, M. F., Anders, R. A., Maitra, A., & Pan, D. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.019 · Cited by 2,370
Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells
Kim, K., Doi, A., Wen, B., Ng, K., Zhao, R., Cahan, P., Kim, J., Aryee, M. J., Ji, H., Ehrlich, L. I. R., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09342 · Cited by 2,313
ILIZAROV, G. A. (1989) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-198901000-00038 · Cited by 2,143
Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus
Wang, N., Tytell, J. D., & Ingber, D. E. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2594 · Cited by 1,762
Self-citationMyotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness
Engler, A. J., Griffin, M. A., Sen, S., Bönnemann, C. G., Sweeney, H. L., & Discher, D. E. (2004) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200405004 · Cited by 1,743
Cited by
Extracellular matrix: A dynamic microenvironment for stem cell niche
Gattazzo, F., Urciuolo, A., & Bonaldo, P. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.01.010 · Cited by 1,294
Single-cell RNA-seq: advances and future challenges
Saliba, A.-E., Westermann, A. J., Gorski, S. A., & Vogel, J. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku555 · Cited by 847
“Moreover, mechanical forces that are present within tissues have a dramatic effect on the expression of many genes (81).”
Role of the extracellular matrix in regulating stem cell fate
Watt, F. M., & Huck, W. T. S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3620 · Cited by 861
Material stiffness influences the polarization state, function and migration mode of macrophages
Sridharan, R., Cavanagh, B., Cameron, A. R., Kelly, D. J., & O'Brien, F. J. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.02.048 · Cited by 450
Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction
Uhler, C., & Shivashankar, G. V. (2017) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.101 · Cited by 445
Metadata
- Authors
- Mammoto, A., Mammoto, T., & Ingber, D. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- Pt 13
- Pages
- 3061-73
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2097444304
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 173
- FWCI
- 17.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.093005
- The paper
- Mammoto, A., Mammoto, T., & Ingber, D. E. (2012). Mechanosensitive mechanisms in transcriptional regulation. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.093005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.