The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial heterokaryons of animal cells from different species
Abstract
A virus, inactivated by ultraviolet light, was used to fuse together cells from different species of vertebrate, and the resulting heterokaryons were examined by autoradiographic and cytological techniques. Heterokaryons could be made with both differentiated and undifferentiated cells: HeLa and Ehrlich ascites cells were studied as examples of undifferentiated cells; rabbit macrophages, rat lymphocytes and hen erythrocytes as examples of differentiated cells. These last three cells were chosen because in them, in varying degrees, the process of differentiation has resulted in suppression of the synthesis of DNA or of both DNA and RNA. This suppression was in all cases found to be reversible: the dormant nuclei could be induced to resume the synthesis of RNA or DNA or both when the differentiated cells were fused with a cell which normally synthesizes RNA and DNA. Observations on heterokaryons in which differentiated cells were fused with HeLa cells and with each other permitted certain general conclusions to be drawn about the regulation of nucleic acid synthesis in the heterokaryon. It was found that if either one of the parent cells normally synthesized RNA, RNA synthesis took place in both types of nuclei in the heterokaryon. If either of the parent cells normally synthesized DNA, DNA synthesis took place in both types of nuclei in the heterokaryon. If neither of the parent cells synthesized DNA, no DNA synthesis took place in the heterokaryon. In all cases where a cell which synthesized a particular nucleic acid was fused with one which did not, the active cell initiated the synthesis of this nucleic acid in the inactive partner. In no case did the inactive cell suppress synthesis in the active partner. The nuclei of heterokaryons in which DNA synthesis took place underwent mitosis, and those nuclei which entered mitosis synchronously usually fused together. This process resulted in the progressive formation of mononucleate hybrid cells, which might thus contain within a single nucleus chromosomal complements derived from different species. These mononucleate hybrid cells were also capable of RNA and DNA synthesis, and many of them in turn underwent mitosis. At metaphase these cells showed, in various combinations, the chromosomal complements of the two parent cells. Mononucleate hybrid cells formed by the fusion of a large number of single cells did not appear to be capable of continued multiplication; but mononucleate cells containing one chromosomal set from each parent cell were still found to be undergoing mitosis many days after cell fusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The growth response of mammalian cells in tissue culture to L-glutamine and L-glutamic acid
Eagle, H., Oyama, V. I., Levy, M., Horton, C. L., & Fleischman, R. (1956) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)65826-0 · Cited by 354
Cited by
POOLE, A. R., HOWELL, J. I., & LUCY, J. A. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/227810a0 · Cited by 351
The Structure and Function of Monocytes and Macrophages
Cohn, Z. A. (1968) · Advances in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60443-5 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Harris, H., Watkins, J. F., Ford, C. E., & Schoefl, G. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1966-03-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-30
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W3156747898
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial heterokaryons of animal cells from different species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.1.1.1
- The paper
- Harris, H., Watkins, J. F., Ford, C. E., & Schoefl, G. I. (1966). Artificial heterokaryons of animal cells from different species. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.1.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.