Cited by 75Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsCellular Mechanics and InteractionsTGF-β signaling in diseases

Induction of stable microtubules in 3T3 fibroblasts by TGF-β and serum

Gundersen, Gregg G., Kim, Irine, Chapin, Cheryl J.·1994·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that fibroblasts induced to migrate into an in vitro wound rapidly generate an array of stable, post-translationally detyrosinated microtubules (Glu MTs) oriented toward the direction of migration. To understand how cells generate a stable array of MTs at a specific location, we have analyzed the contribution of media components to the formation of oriented Glu MTs in wounded monolayers of 3T3 fibroblasts. When confluent monolayers were placed in serum-free medium (SFM) for 2 days before wounding, the cells contained virtually no Glu MTs or nocodazole-resistant MTs and were incapable of generating Glu MTs in response to wounding. Such SFM-treated monolayers were capable of generating oriented Glu MTs within 1 hour of wounding, if calf serum (CS) was added back to the medium. The Glu MTs in the CS refed cells were oriented toward the wound in cells at the wound edge, and were juxtanuclear in cells within the monolayer, demonstrating that CS restored the Glu MT array characteristic of each cell type. To determine the nature of the ‘Glu MT-inducing’ factor in CS, we subjected CS to different treatments and found that the CS factor was nondialyzable, resistant to heat, mild acid and trypsin, but inactivated by treatment with dithiothreitol. The factor was not absorbed by charcoal and was present in lipoprotein-deficient serum. These properties are consistent with the properties of a number of polypep-tide growth factors, so we screened purified growth factors for their ability to induce Glu MTs in wounded SFM-treated monolayers. Of all the growth factors tested, only TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 induced a significant level (> 70% of the CS response) of oriented Glu MTs. The SFM-treated cells were exquisitely sensitive to TGF-β1, with significant induction of Glu MTs observed at 0.01 ng/ml TGF-β1. Induction of Glu MTs observed by immunofluorescence after CS or TGF-β treatments were paralleled by increases in Glu tubulin detected on western blots. The Glu MTs formed after either CS or TGF-β1 treatment showed enhanced resistance to nocodazole, confirming that both treatments increased the level of stable MTs in cells. The TGF-β1 induction of stable MTs was slower than that of CS (2-4 hours onset versus 1 hour onset), but by 24 hours the level of MT stabilization in TGF-β1 was even greater than that in CS. Unlike CS, TGF-β1 did not stimulate the migration of SFM-treated cells into the wound or the entry of SFM-treated cells into the cell cycle, showing that MT stabilization is independent of these events. These results demonstrate that MT stabilization can be regulated by external factors and that TGF-β is a potent inducing factor for stable MTs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.107.3.645

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Earlier experiments showed that the majority of stable microtubules, identified by nocodazole resistance and detyrosinated tubulin, disappear upon prolonged serum starvation and reappear upon serum addition in 3T3 cells.

    “Earlier experiments have shown that the majority of stable MTs, identified by their nocodazole-resistance and immunolabeling for detyrosinated tubulin, disappear upon prolonged serum starvation and reappear again upon the addition of serum in 3T3 cells (Gundersen et al., 1994).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gundersen, G. G., Kim, I., & Chapin, C. J.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
1994-03-01
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
645-659
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W2163059327
Cited by
75
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM042026, GM 42026)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
Keywords
microtubule stabilization, TGF-β1, TGF-beta2, 3T3 fibroblasts, serum, cell migration, wound healing, nocodazole resistance, growth factors, cell polarity, cell adhesion, cell-substrate interaction
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood, Cell Division, Cell Movement, Growth Substances, Microtubules, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Blotting, Western, Nocodazole, Transforming Growth Factor beta, 3T3 Cells, Culture Media, Serum-Free, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review