The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Surface morphology and mechanical properties of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy
Abstract
We describe the morphology and mechanical stability of the apical surface of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Living cells could be imaged in physiological solution for several hours without noticeable deterioration. Cell boundaries appear as ridges that clearly demarcate neighboring cells. In some cases the nucleus of individual cells could be seen, though apparently only in very thin areas of the monolayer. Two types of protrusions on the surface could be visualized. Smooth bulges that varied in width from a few hundred nanometers to several micrometers, which appear to represent relatively rigid subapical structures. Another type of protrusion extended well above the membrane and was swept back and forth during the imaging. However, the microvilli that are typically present on the apical surface could not be resolved. For comparison, a transformed MDCK cell line expressing the K-rasoncogene was also examined. When cultured on solid substrata at low density, the R5 cells spread out and are less than 100 nm thick over large areas with both extensive processes and rounded edges. Many intracellular structures such as the nucleus, cytoskeletal elements and vesicles could be visualized. None of the intracellular structures seen in the AFM images could be seen by scanning electron microscopy. Both R5 cells and MDCK monolayers required imaging forces of >2 nN for good image contrast. Force measurements on the MDCK monolayers show that they are very soft, with an effective spring constant of ∼0.002 N/m for the apical plasma membrane, over the first micrometer of deformation, resulting in a height deformation of approximately 500 nm per nanoNewton of applied force. The mechanical properties of the cells could be manipulated by addition of glutaraldehyde. These changes were monitored in real time by collecting force curves during the fixation reaction. The curves show a stiffening of the apical plasma membrane that was completed in ∼1 minute. On the basis of these measurements and the imaging forces required, we conclude that deformation of the plasma membrane is an important component of the contrast mechanism, in effect ‘staining’ structures based on their relative rigidity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spatially resolved force spectroscopy of biological surfaces using the atomic force microscope
Heinz, W. F., & Hoh, J. H. (1999) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(99)01304-9 · Cited by 373
Self-citationWu, H. W., Kuhn, T., & Moy, V. T. (1998) · Scanning · doi:10.1002/sca.1998.4950200504 · Cited by 334
Physical Morphology and Surface Properties of Unsaturated Pseudomonas putida Biofilms
Auerbach, I. D., Sorensen, C., Hansma, H. G., & Holden, P. A. (2000) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.182.13.3809-3815.2000 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoh, J. H., & Schoenenberger, C.-A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1994-05-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1105-1114
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2169969818
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surface morphology and mechanical properties of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.107.5.1105
- The paper
- Hoh, J. H., & Schoenenberger, C.-A. (1994). Surface morphology and mechanical properties of MDCK monolayers by atomic force microscopy. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.107.5.1105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.