The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct observation and quantification of macrophage chemoattraction to the growth factor CSF-1
Abstract
The cloned mouse macrophage cell line, BAC1.25F, resembles primary macrophages in its dependence on colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) for both viability and proliferation. Re-addition of CSF-1 to cytokine-deprived cells, which are rounded with diffusely organised F-actin, stimulates rapid cell spreading and cell polarisation. Using the Dunn chemotaxis chamber the movement of stimulated macrophages was monitored over a 2 hour period. Cells re stimulated with 1.32 nM human recombinant CSF-1 migrated at a mean rate of 7.71 µm per hour, but showed no directional preferences. In a linear concentration gradient of CSF-1, cytokine-deprived cells were again stim ulated to migrate and the mean rate of cell motility, at 6.88 µm per hour, was not significantly different from that measured in an isotropic environment of CSF-1. However, there was a strong preference for the cells to orientate so that their long axes aligned with the CSF-1 gradient and they migrated preferentially towards the source of CSF-1. Migrating cells contained abundant F-actin within the leading lamellae as judged by confocal imaging of fluor escent phalloidin, but the actin was not arranged into stress fibre-like structures. These data support the proposition that CSF-1 is both a chemokinetic and chemotactic agent for macrophages. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) failed to stimulate cell migration and thus was neither chemokinetic nor a chemotactic agent. However, cells exposed to a dual concentration gradient of both TNF-α and CSF-1 did migrate successfully, although the chemotactic response to CSF-1 was abolished.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor
Sherr, C. (1990) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v75.1.1.bloodjournal7511 · Cited by 353
Cited by
Fantin, A., Vieira, J. M., Gestri, G., Denti, L., Schwarz, Q., Prykhozhij, S., Peri, F., Wilson, S. W., & Ruhrberg, C. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-12-257832 · Cited by 1,153
CSF-1 receptor signaling in myeloid cells.
Stanley, E. R., & Chitu, V. (2014) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021857 · Cited by 825
CSF-1 regulation of the wandering macrophage: complexity in action
Pixley, F. J., & Stanley, E. R. (2004) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2004.09.016 · Cited by 807
Herbomel, P., Thisse, B., & Thisse, C. (2001) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0393 · Cited by 574
Davis, J. M., Clay, H., Lewis, J. L., Ghori, N., Herbomel, P., & Ramakrishnan, L. (2002) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00475-2 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- Webb, S. E., Pollard, J. W., & Jones, G. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 793-803
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2122762943
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct observation and quantification of macrophage chemoattraction to the growth factor CSF-1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.109.4.793
- The paper
- Webb, S. E., Pollard, J. W., & Jones, G. E. (1996). Direct observation and quantification of macrophage chemoattraction to the growth factor CSF-1. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.109.4.793
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.