Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct observation and quantification of macrophage chemoattraction to the growth factor CSF-1

Webb, Sarah E., Pollard, Jeffrey W., Jones, Gareth E.·1996·Journal of Cell Science

Abstract

The cloned mouse macrophage cell line, BAC1.25F, resembles primary macrophages in its dependence on colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) for both viability and proliferation. Re-addition of CSF-1 to cytokine-deprived cells, which are rounded with diffusely organised F-actin, stimulates rapid cell spreading and cell polarisation. Using the Dunn chemotaxis chamber the movement of stimulated macrophages was monitored over a 2 hour period. Cells re stimulated with 1.32 nM human recombinant CSF-1 migrated at a mean rate of 7.71 µm per hour, but showed no directional preferences. In a linear concentration gradient of CSF-1, cytokine-deprived cells were again stim ulated to migrate and the mean rate of cell motility, at 6.88 µm per hour, was not significantly different from that measured in an isotropic environment of CSF-1. However, there was a strong preference for the cells to orientate so that their long axes aligned with the CSF-1 gradient and they migrated preferentially towards the source of CSF-1. Migrating cells contained abundant F-actin within the leading lamellae as judged by confocal imaging of fluor escent phalloidin, but the actin was not arranged into stress fibre-like structures. These data support the proposition that CSF-1 is both a chemokinetic and chemotactic agent for macrophages. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α) failed to stimulate cell migration and thus was neither chemokinetic nor a chemotactic agent. However, cells exposed to a dual concentration gradient of both TNF-α and CSF-1 did migrate successfully, although the chemotactic response to CSF-1 was abolished.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jcs.109.4.793

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Webb, S. E., Pollard, J. W., & Jones, G. E.
Venue
Journal of Cell Science
Published
1996-04-01
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
793-803
ISSN
  • 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9137
OpenAlex
W2122762943
Cited by
179
References
1
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct observation and quantification of macrophage chemoattraction to the growth factor CSF-1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.109.4.793
The paper
Webb, S. E., Pollard, J. W., & Jones, G. E. (1996). Direct observation and quantification of macrophage chemoattraction to the growth factor CSF-1. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.109.4.793

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.