E-MAP-115 (ensconsin) associates dynamically with microtubules in vivo and is not a physiological modulator of microtubule dynamics
Open accessAbstract
Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) have been hypothesized to regulate microtubule dynamics and/or functions. To test hypotheses concerning E-MAP-115 (ensconsin) function, we prepared stable cell lines expressing conjugates in which the full-length MAP (Ensc) or its microtubule-binding domain (EMTB) was conjugated to one or more green fluorescent protein (GFP) molecules. Because both distribution and microtubule-binding properties of GFP-Ensc, GFP-EMTB, and 2×, 3×, or 4×GFP-EMTB chimeras all appeared to be identical to those of endogenous E-MAP-115 (ensconsin), we used the 2×GFP-EMTB molecule as a reporter for the behavior and microtubule-binding function of endogenous MAP. Dual wavelength time-lapse fluorescence imaging of 2×GFP-EMTB in cells microinjected with labeled tubulin revealed that this GFP-MAP chimera associated with the lattice of all microtubules immediately upon polymerization and dissociated concomitant with depolymerization, suggesting that dynamics of MAP:microtubule interactions were at least as rapid as tubulin:microtubule dynamics in the polymerization reaction. Presence of both GFP-EMTB chimeras and endogenous E-MAP-115 (ensconsin) along apparently all cellular microtubules at all cell cycle stages suggested that the MAP might function in modulating stability or dynamics of microtubules, a capability shown previously in transiently transfected cells. Although cells with extremely high expression levels of GFP-EMTB chimera exhibited stabilized microtubules, cells expressing four to ten times the physiological level of endogenous MAP exhibited microtubule dynamics indistinguishable from those of untransfected cells. This result shows that E-MAP-115 (ensconsin) is unlikely to function as a microtubule stabilizer in vivo. Instead, this MAP most likely serves to modulate microtubule functions or interactions with other cytoskeletal elements.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microtubule-binding proteins can induce artifacts of the microtubule cytoskeleton when highly overexpressed, as observed with the N-terminal fragment of Ensconsin/MAP7.
“A potential limitation of our approach is that MT-binding proteins can induce artifacts of the MT cytoskeleton when highly overexpressed, as has, for example, been observed with the N-terminal fragment of Ensconsin/MAP7 (Faire et al., 1999).”
From A live-cell marker to visualize the dynamics of stable microtubules throughout the cell cycle (2023) · cites this paper as Faire et al., 1999
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Walker, R. A., O'Brien, E. T., Pryer, N. K., Soboeiro, M. F., Voter, W. A., Erickson, H. P., & Salmon, E. D. (1988) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.107.4.1437 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Self-citationAnn Jordan, M., Thrower, D., & Wilson, L. (1992) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.102.3.401 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A live-cell marker to visualize the dynamics of stable microtubules throughout the cell cycle
Jansen, K. I., Iwanski, M. K., Burute, M., & Kapitein, L. C. (2023) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202106105 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Faire, K., Waterman-Storer, C. M., Gruber, D., Masson, D., Salmon, E. D., & Chloë Bulinski, J.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- 2 Department of Biology, CB3280, 607 Fordham Hall, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- University of Geneva (CH)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- 1 Departments of Anatomy & Cell Biology and Pathology, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, 630 W. 168th St, Rm BB1213, New York, NY 10032-3702, USA
- ORCID
- Gruber, Dorota
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4243-4255
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2184433261
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- cdr.lib.unc.edu
- Locations
- Journal of Cell Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (CA 70951, R01CA070951)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM24364)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR08316, F32AR008316)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Keywords
- microtubule-associated proteins, microtubule dynamics, microtubule stabilization, microtubule-binding domain, cell cycle, cytoskeleton
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Breast Neoplasms, Cell Line, Female, Humans, Luminescent Proteins, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Mitotic Index, Spindle Apparatus, Molecular Sequence Data, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Transfection, Tumor Cells, Cultured, DNA Primers, Green Fluorescent Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review