The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination
Abstract
During mouse meiosis, the early prophase RAD51/DMC1 recombination protein sites, which are associated with the chromosome cores and which serve as markers for ongoing DNA-DNA interactions, are in ten-fold excess of the eventual reciprocal recombinant events. Most, if not all, of these early interactions are eliminated as prophase progresses. The manner in which these sites are eliminated is the focus of this investigation. We report that these sites acquire replication protein A, RPA and the Escherichia coliMUTS homologue, MSH4p, and somewhat later the Bloom helicase, BLM, while simultaneously losing the RAD51/DMC1 component. Eventually the RPA component is also lost and BLM sites remain. At that time, the MUTL homologue, MLH1p,which is essential for reciprocal recombination in the mouse, appears in numbers and locations that correspond to the distribution of reciprocal recombination events. However, the MLH1 foci do not appear to coincide with the remaining BLM sites. The MLH1p is specifically localized to electron-microscope-defined recombination nodules. We consider the possibility that the homology-search RAD51/DMC1 complexes are involved in homologous chromosome synapsis but that most of these early DNA-DNA interactions are later resolved by the anti-recombination RPA/MSH4/BLM-topoisomerase complex,thereby preventing the formation of superfluous reciprocal recombinant events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RPA involvement in the damage-recognition and incision steps of nucleotide excision repair
He, Z., Henricksen, L. A., Wold, M. S., & Ingles, C. J. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/374566a0 · Cited by 389
Cited by
THE GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX
Page, S. L., & Hawley, R. S. (2004) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.155141 · Cited by 709
Börner, G. V., Kleckner, N., & Hunter, N. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00292-2 · Cited by 698
Mouse Sycp1 functions in synaptonemal complex assembly, meiotic recombination, and XY body formation
de Vries, F. A. T., de Boer, E., van den Bosch, M., Baarends, W. M., Ooms, M., Yuan, L., Liu, J.-G., van Zeeland, A. A., Heyting, C., & Pastink, A. (2005) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.329705 · Cited by 455
Revenkova, E., Eijpe, M., Heyting, C., Hodges, C. A., Hunt, P. A., Liebe, B., Scherthan, H., & Jessberger, R. (2004) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1135 · Cited by 375
Absence of Mouse REC8 Cohesin Promotes Synapsis of Sister Chromatids in Meiosis
Xu, H., Beasley, M. D., Warren, W. D., van der Horst, G. T. J., & McKay, M. J. (2005) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.018 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Moens, P. B., Kolas, N. K., Tarsounas, M., Marcon, E., Cohen, P. E., & Spyropoulos, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-04-15
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1611-1622
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2130884140
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.115.8.1611
- The paper
- Moens, P. B., Kolas, N. K., Tarsounas, M., Marcon, E., Cohen, P. E., & Spyropoulos, B. (2002). The time course and chromosomal localization of recombination-related proteins at meiosis in the mouse are compatible with models that can resolve the early DNA-DNA interactions without reciprocal recombination. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.115.8.1611
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.