The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interference reflection microscopy in cell biology: methodology and applications
Abstract
Since its introduction into cell biology by Curtis in 1964, interference reflection microscopy (IRM) has been used by an increasing number of researchers to study cell-substrate interactions in living cells in culture. With the use of antiflex objectives, high-contrast IRM images can now be readily obtained. From the different theories on image formation in IRM that have been put forward, it can be seen that a zero-order interference pattern is generated at high illuminating numerical aperture. This yields information on the closeness of contact between cell and substrate, with only minor perturbation by reflections from the dorsal cell surface. Therefore, the proper use of illuminating apertures is crucial. Nevertheless, IRM images have to be interpreted with caution, especially under thin cytoplasmic sheets. Quantitative IRM is possible only with a mathematical model for finite illuminating aperture interferometry and with an independent measurement of cell thickness for values up to 1 micron. IRM has been applied qualitatively to a large number of cell types, and it seems that there are two universal types of adhesion. Focal contacts are small regions of closest cell-substrate apposition, possibly of immediate contact, that are associated with the distal end of actin filament bundles. They are firm attachment structures that hold the cell in place and in its spread shape. Close contacts are broad areas of reduced cell-to-substrate distance. They are weaker but highly dynamic adhesions that sustain rapid movements of cells or cell parts over the substrate. Although a number of independent observations suggest that adhesion patterns of malignantly transformed cells differ from those of their normal counterparts, there is no simple correlation between malignancy in vivo and altered contact formation in vitro. The adhesion pattern seems to be determined by the locomotory state of the cells rather than by their tissue of origin. Finally, IRM can also be used to enhance contrast in images of fixed preparations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adhesion receptors of the immune system
Springer, T. A. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346425a0 · Cited by 6,477
Lrp4 is a receptor for Agrin and forms a complex with MuSK
Kim, N., Stiegler, A. L., Cameron, T. O., Hallock, P. T., Gomez, A. M., Huang, J. H., Hubbard, S. R., Dustin, M. L., & Burden, S. J. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.002 · Cited by 676
Zhu, J., Luo, B.-H., Xiao, T., Zhang, C., Nishida, N., & Springer, T. A. (2008) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.018 · Cited by 503
Quantitative Reflection Interference Contrast Microscopy (RICM) in Soft Matter and Cell Adhesion
Limozin, L., & Sengupta, K. (2009) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.200900601 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Verschueren, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1985-04-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 279-301
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2402336340
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interference reflection microscopy in cell biology: methodology and applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.75.1.279
- The paper
- Verschueren, H. (1985). Interference reflection microscopy in cell biology: methodology and applications. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.75.1.279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.