The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutrient balancing in grasshoppers: behavioural and physiological correlates of dietary breadth
Abstract
SUMMARY: We examined correlates of nutrient balancing with dietary range by comparing diet selection and ingestive, post-ingestive and performance-related responses to macronutrient imbalance in two species of grasshopper. One of the two species, Locusta migratoria (the African migratory locust), is a specialist grass-feeder, while the other, Schistocerca gregaria (the desert locust), is a generalist herbivore that includes both grasses and forbs in its diet. In ad libitum conditions, both species composed a balanced intake of the two macronutrients protein and carbohydrate from nutritionally complementary synthetic foods, but the composition of the selected diet differed, with the generalist selecting more protein, but not carbohydrate, than the grass-specialist. The grass-specialist, by contrast,retained ingested nitrogen more efficiently on the ad libitum diets. When confined to nutritionally imbalanced foods, both species regulated ingestion in such a way as to mitigate excesses as well as deficits of the two nutrients. The responses were, however, distinct in the two species, with the generalist feeder ingesting greater excesses of protein than the specialist. The species also differed in their post-ingestive responses to ingested excesses of nutrient, with the generalist but not the specialist using protein-derived carbon as an energy source when fed carbohydrate-deficient foods. The generalist also retained a higher level of body protein when confined to protein-deficient diets. The data suggested one functional reason why the generalist species selected a diet with higher protein content in the ad libitum treatment because, when confined to the nutritionally imbalanced foods, development rate peaked on higher protein foods for the generalist compared with the specialist. Many aspects of these data agree with the prediction that generalist-feeding animals should show greater behavioural and physiological flexibility in their responses to nutrient imbalance than do specialists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION
Ehrlich, P. R., & Raven, P. H. (1964) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x · Cited by 4,495
Herbivory in Relation to Plant Nitrogen Content
Mattson, W. J. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001003 · Cited by 3,425
Herbivores. Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites.
Wilcock, C. C., Rosenthal, G. A., & Janzen, D. H. (1981) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259845 · Cited by 1,984
The Nutritional Ecology of Immature Insects
Scriber, J. M., & Slansky, F. (1981) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.001151 · Cited by 1,847
Schoonhoven, L. M., Jermy, T., & van Loon, J. J. A. (1998) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3200-6 · Cited by 1,686
Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects
Bernays, E. A., & Chapman, R. E. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b102508 · Cited by 1,513
Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-3872 · Cited by 1,411
On the Evolution of Host Specificity in Phytophagous Arthropods
Bernays, E., & Graham, M. (1988) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941237 · Cited by 1,188
(1969) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/20506 · Cited by 721
Slansky, F., & Feeny, P. (1977) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942617 · Cited by 579
Cited by
Plant Volatile Compounds: Sensory Cues for Health and Nutritional Value?
Goff, S. A., & Klee, H. J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1112614 · Cited by 710
Optimal foraging when regulating intake of multiple nutrients
Simpson, S. J., Sibly, R. M., Lee, K. P., Behmer, S. T., & Raubenheimer, D. (2004) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.03.003 · Cited by 532
Self-citationLocust Phase Polyphenism: An Update
Pener, M. P., & Simpson, S. J. (2009) · Advances in Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2806(08)36001-9 · Cited by 481
Self-citationvan Broekhoven, S., Oonincx, D. G. A. B., van Huis, A., & van Loon, J. J. A. (2015) · Journal of Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2014.12.005 · Cited by 451
Sørensen, A., Mayntz, D., Raubenheimer, D., & Simpson, S. J. (2008) · Obesity · doi:10.1038/oby.2007.58 · Cited by 218
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Raubenheimer, D., & Simpson, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-05-15
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1669-1681
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2102388634
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient balancing in grasshoppers: behavioural and physiological correlates of dietary breadth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.00336
- The paper
- Raubenheimer, D., & Simpson, S. J. (2003). Nutrient balancing in grasshoppers: behavioural and physiological correlates of dietary breadth. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00336
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.