The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The aerodynamics of insect flight
Abstract
SUMMARY: The flight of insects has fascinated physicists and biologists for more than a century. Yet, until recently, researchers were unable to rigorously quantify the complex wing motions of flapping insects or measure the forces and flows around their wings. However, recent developments in high-speed videography and tools for computational and mechanical modeling have allowed researchers to make rapid progress in advancing our understanding of insect flight. These mechanical and computational fluid dynamic models, combined with modern flow visualization techniques, have revealed that the fluid dynamic phenomena underlying flapping flight are different from those of non-flapping,2-D wings on which most previous models were based. In particular, even at high angles of attack, a prominent leading edge vortex remains stably attached on the insect wing and does not shed into an unsteady wake, as would be expected from non-flapping 2-D wings. Its presence greatly enhances the forces generated by the wing, thus enabling insects to hover or maneuver. In addition, flight forces are further enhanced by other mechanisms acting during changes in angle of attack, especially at stroke reversal, the mutual interaction of the two wings at dorsal stroke reversal or wing–wake interactions following stroke reversal. This progress has enabled the development of simple analytical and empirical models that allow us to calculate the instantaneous forces on flapping insect wings more accurately than was previously possible. It also promises to foster new and exciting multi-disciplinary collaborations between physicists who seek to explain the phenomenology, biologists who seek to understand its relevance to insect physiology and evolution, and engineers who are inspired to build micro-robotic insects using these principles. This review covers the basic physical principles underlying flapping flight in insects, results of recent experiments concerning the aerodynamics of insect flight, as well as the different approaches used to model these phenomena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory for aerodynamic force and moment in viscous flows
Wu, J. C. (1981) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.50966 · Cited by 388
The aerodynamics of revolving wings II. Propeller force coefficients from mayfly to quail
Usherwood, J. R., & Ellington, C. P. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.11.1565 · Cited by 230
Mechanical performance of aquatic rowing and flying.
Walker, J. A., & Westneat, M. W. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1224 · Cited by 215
Cited by
Closed-Loop Turbulence Control: Progress and Challenges
Brunton, S. L., & Noack, B. R. (2015) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.4031175 · Cited by 623
Flapping flight for biomimetic robotic insects: part I-system modeling
Deng, X., Schenato, L., Wu, W. C., & Sastry, S. S. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2006.875480 · Cited by 355
Flexible clap and fling in tiny insect flight
Miller, L. A., & Peskin, C. S. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.028662 · Cited by 179
Mechanics of the thorax in flies
Deora, T., Gundiah, N., & Sane, S. P. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.128363 · Cited by 98
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sane, S. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 4191-4208
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2051788799
- Cited by
- 1,253
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 40.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The aerodynamics of insect flight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.00663
- The paper
- Sane, S. P. (2003). The aerodynamics of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00663
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.