The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of geckos running vertically
Abstract
SUMMARY: Geckos with adhesive toe pads rapidly climb even smooth vertical surfaces. We challenged geckos (Hemidactylus garnotii) to climb up a smooth vertical track that contained a force platform. Geckos climbed vertically at up to 77 cm s-1 with a stride frequency of 15 Hz using a trotting gait. During each step, whole body fore–aft, lateral and normal forces all decreased to zero when the animal attached or detached its toe pads. Peak fore–aft force was twice body weight at mid-step. Geckos climbed at a constant average velocity without generating decelerating forces on their center of mass in the direction of motion. Although mass-specific mechanical power to climb was ten times the value expected for level running, the total mechanical energy of climbing was only 5–11% greater than the potential energy change. Fore- and hindlegs both pulled toward the midline, possibly loading the attachment mechanisms. Attachment and detachment of feet occupied 13% and 37% of stance time, respectively. As climbing speed increased, the absolute time required to attach and detach did not decrease, suggesting that the period of fore–aft force production might be constrained. During ascent, the forelegs pulled toward, while hindlegs pushed away from the vertical surface, generating a net pitching moment toward the surface to counterbalance pitch-back away from the surface. Differential leg function appears essential for effective vertical as well as horizontal locomotion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Leg design in hexapedal runners
Full, R. J., Blickhan, R., & Ting, L. H. (1991) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.158.1.369 · Cited by 256
Self-citationTreecreeper Climbing; Mechanics, Energetics, and Structural Adaptations
Norberg, R. A. (1986) · Ornis Scandinavica · doi:10.2307/3676828 · Cited by 59
Cited by
Smooth Vertical Surface Climbing With Directional Adhesion
Kim, S., Spenko, M., Trujillo, S., Heyneman, B., Santos, D., & Cutkosky, M. R. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2007.909786 · Cited by 661
Biologically inspired climbing with a hexapedal robot
Spenko, M. J., Haynes, G. C., Saunders, J. A., Cutkosky, M. R., Rizzi, A. A., Full, R. J., & Koditschek, D. E. (2008) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20238 · Cited by 426
Self-citationLooking Beyond Fibrillar Features to Scale Gecko‐Like Adhesion
Bartlett, M. D., Croll, A. B., King, D. R., Paret, B. M., Irschick, D. J., & Crosby, A. J. (2012) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201104191 · Cited by 317
Parness, A., Soto, D., Esparza, N., Gravish, N., Wilkinson, M., Autumn, K., & Cutkosky, M. (2009) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0048 · Cited by 277
Self-citationWaalbot II: Adhesion Recovery and Improved Performance of a Climbing Robot using Fibrillar Adhesives
Murphy, M. P., Kute, C., Mengüç, Y., & Sitti, M. (2011) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364910382862 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Autumn, K., Hsieh, S. T., Dudek, D. M., Chen, J., Chitaphan, C., & Full, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2006-01-15
- Volume
- 209
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 260-272
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2157678875
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of geckos running vertically. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.01980
- The paper
- Autumn, K., Hsieh, S. T., Dudek, D. M., Chen, J., Chitaphan, C., & Full, R. J. (2006). Dynamics of geckos running vertically. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01980
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.