Cited by 15Robotic Locomotion and ControlBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effects of gravity on human walking: a new test of the dynamic similarity hypothesis using a predictive model

Raichlen, David A.·2008·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

SUMMARY The dynamic similarity hypothesis (DSH) suggests that differences in animal locomotor biomechanics are due mostly to differences in size. According to the DSH, when the ratios of inertial to gravitational forces are equal between two animals that differ in size [e.g. at equal Froude numbers, where Froude =velocity2/(gravity × hip height)], their movements can be made similar by multiplying all time durations by one constant, all forces by a second constant and all linear distances by a third constant. The DSH has been generally supported by numerous comparative studies showing that as inertial forces differ (i.e. differences in the centripetal force acting on the animal due to variation in hip heights), animals walk with dynamic similarity. However, humans walking in simulated reduced gravity do not walk with dynamically similar kinematics. The simulated gravity experiments did not completely account for the effects of gravity on all body segments, and the importance of gravity in the DSH requires further examination. This study uses a kinematic model to predict the effects of gravity on human locomotion,taking into account both the effects of gravitational forces on the upper body and on the limbs. Results show that dynamic similarity is maintained in altered gravitational environments. Thus, the DSH does account for differences in the inertial forces governing locomotion (e.g. differences in hip height)as well as differences in the gravitational forces governing locomotion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.020073

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The kinematic model of Raichlen (2008) matches the data presented in this review.

    “The kinematic model of Raichlen (2008) which predicts the effects of gravity on human locomotion matches the data as presented in this review.”
  • Raichlen (2008) calculated that relative stride lengths at 2 m/s and the Froude number at walk-to-run transition speed increase with decreasing gravity.

    “The author calculated, that relative stride lengths at 2 meters per second (m/s) as well as the Froude number at walk-to-run transition speed increases with decreasing gravity (Raichlen, 2008).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raichlen, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Raichlen, David A.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2008-09-01
Volume
211
Issue
17
Pages
2767-2772
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2147609658
Cited by
15
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
human walking, gravity, Froude number, inertial forces, gravitational force, hip height, kinematic modeling, locomotion biomechanics, size scaling, altered gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review