The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flapping wing aerodynamics: from insects to vertebrates
Open accessAbstract
More than a million insects and approximately 11,000 vertebrates utilize flapping wings to fly. However, flapping flight has only been studied in a few of these species, so many challenges remain in understanding this form of locomotion. Five key aerodynamic mechanisms have been identified for insect flight. Among these is the leading edge vortex, which is a convergent solution to avoid stall for insects, bats and birds. The roles of the other mechanisms – added mass, clap and fling, rotational circulation and wing–wake interactions – have not yet been thoroughly studied in the context of vertebrate flight. Further challenges to understanding bat and bird flight are posed by the complex, dynamic wing morphologies of these species and the more turbulent airflow generated by their wings compared with that observed during insect flight. Nevertheless, three dimensionless numbers that combine key flow, morphological and kinematic parameters – the Reynolds number, Rossby number and advance ratio – govern flapping wing aerodynamics for both insects and vertebrates. These numbers can thus be used to organize an integrative framework for studying and comparing animal flapping flight. Here, we provide a roadmap for developing such a framework, highlighting the aerodynamic mechanisms that remain to be quantified and compared across species. Ultimately, incorporating complex flight maneuvers, environmental effects and developmental stages into this framework will also be essential to advancing our understanding of the biomechanics, movement ecology and evolution of animal flight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The global diversity of birds in space and time
Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K., & Mooers, A. O. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11631 · Cited by 3,934
Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency
Taylor, G. K., Nudds, R. L., & Thomas, A. L. R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02000 · Cited by 994
An Introduction to Flapping Wing Aerodynamics
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Kang, C.-K., & Liu, H. (2013) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139583916 · Cited by 303
Aerodynamics of tip-reversal upstroke in a revolving pigeon wing
Crandell, K. E., & Tobalske, B. W. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.051342 · Cited by 56
Cited by
Zhu, J., White, C., Wainwright, D. K., Di Santo, V., Lauder, G. V., & Bart-Smith, H. (2019) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aax4615 · Cited by 353
The function and organization of the motor system controlling flight maneuvers in flies
Lindsay, T., Sustar, A., & Dickinson, M. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.018 · Cited by 103
Mechanics of the thorax in flies
Deora, T., Gundiah, N., & Sane, S. P. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.128363 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Chin, D. D., & Lentink, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2016-04-01
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 920-932
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2335421812
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 30.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flapping wing aerodynamics: from insects to vertebrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.042317
- The paper
- Chin, D. D., & Lentink, D. (2016). Flapping wing aerodynamics: from insects to vertebrates. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.042317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.