The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Integrating biomechanics, behavior and ecology requires a mechanistic understanding of the processes producing the movement of animals. This calls for contemporaneous biomechanical, behavioral and environmental data along movement pathways. A recently formulated unifying movement ecology paradigm facilitates the integration of existing biomechanics, optimality, cognitive and random paradigms for studying movement. We focus on the use of tri-axial acceleration (ACC) data to identify behavioral modes of GPS-tracked free-ranging wild animals and demonstrate its application to study the movements of griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus, Hablizl 1783). In particular, we explore a selection of nonlinear and decision tree methods that include support vector machines, classification and regression trees, random forest methods and artificial neural networks and compare them with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) as a baseline for classifying behavioral modes. Using a dataset of 1035 ground-truthed ACC segments, we found that all methods can accurately classify behavior (80–90%) and, as expected, all nonlinear methods outperformed LDA. We also illustrate how ACC-identified behavioral modes provide the means to examine how vulture flight is affected by environmental factors, hence facilitating the integration of behavioral, biomechanical and ecological data. Our analysis of just over three-quarters of a million GPS and ACC measurements obtained from 43 free-ranging vultures across 9783 vulture-days suggests that their annual breeding schedule might be selected primarily in response to seasonal conditions favoring rising-air columns (thermals) and that rare long-range forays of up to 1750 km from the home range are performed despite potentially heavy energetic costs and a low rate of food intake, presumably to explore new breeding, social and long-term resource location opportunities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research
Nathan, R., Getz, W. M., Revilla, E., Holyoak, M., Kadmon, R., Saltz, D., & Smouse, P. E. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0800375105 · Cited by 2,968
Self-citationActivity recognition from accelerometer data
Ravi, N., Dandekar, N., Mysore, P., & Littman, M. L. (2005) · Cited by 1,419
A Review of Accelerometry-Based Wearable Motion Detectors for Physical Activity Monitoring
Yang, C.-C., & Hsu, Y.-L. (2010) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s100807772 · Cited by 1,058
The Technology of Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitors: Current and Future
CHEN, K. Y., & BASSETT, D. R. (2005) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82 · Cited by 996
Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology
Cooke, S. J., Hinch, S. G., Wikelski, M., Andrews, R. D., Kuchel, L. J., Wolcott, T. G., & Butler, P. J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.04.003 · Cited by 834
Self-citationWILSON, R. P., WHITE, C. R., QUINTANA, F., HALSEY, L. G., LIEBSCH, N., MARTIN, G. R., & BUTLER, P. J. (2006) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01127.x · Cited by 797
Hebblewhite, M., & Haydon, D. T. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0087 · Cited by 740
Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology
COOKE, S. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(04)00112-0 · Cited by 656
Cited by
Observing the unwatchable through acceleration logging of animal behavior
Brown, D. D., Kays, R., Wikelski, M., Wilson, R., & Klimley, A. (2013) · Animal Biotelemetry · doi:10.1186/2050-3385-1-20 · Cited by 623
Self-citationQuantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data
Rowcliffe, J. M., Kays, R., Kranstauber, B., Carbone, C., & Jansen, P. A. (2014) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12278 · Cited by 580
Optimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research
Williams, H. J., Taylor, L. A., Benhamou, S., Bijleveld, A. I., Clay, T. A., de Grissac, S., Demšar, U., English, H. M., Franconi, N., Gómez‐Laich, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13094 · Cited by 333
A guide for studying among-individual behavioral variation from movement data in the wild
Hertel, A. G., Niemelä, P. T., Dingemanse, N. J., & Mueller, T. (2020) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-020-00216-8 · Cited by 282
Vázquez Diosdado, J. A., Barker, Z. E., Hodges, H. R., Amory, J. R., Croft, D. P., Bell, N. J., & Codling, E. A. (2015) · Animal Biotelemetry · doi:10.1186/s40317-015-0045-8 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Nathan, R., Spiegel, O., Fortmann-Roe, S., Harel, R., Wikelski, M., & Getz, W. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2012-03-15
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 986-996
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2136375252
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 21.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.058602
- The paper
- Nathan, R., Spiegel, O., Fortmann-Roe, S., Harel, R., Wikelski, M., & Getz, W. M. (2012). Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.058602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.