The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Directional cues in Drosophila melanogaster audition: structure of acoustic flow and inter-antennal velocity differences
Abstract
SUMMARY: Drosophila melanogaster have bilateral antisymmetric antennae that receive the particle velocity component of an acoustic stimulus. Acoustic communication is important in their courtship, which takes place in the acoustic near-field. Here, the small size of the dipole sound source (the male wing) and the rapid attenuation rate of particle velocity produce a spatially divergent sound field with highly variable magnitude. Also, male and female D. melanogaster are not usually stationary during courtship, resulting in a variable directionality of the acoustic stimulus. Using both particle image velocimetry and laser Doppler vibrometry, we examined the stimulus flow around the head of D. melanogaster to identify the actual geometry of the acoustic input to the antennae and its directional response. We reveal that the stimulus changes in both magnitude and direction as a function of its angle of incidence. Remarkably, directionality is substantial, with inter-antennal velocity differences of 25 dB at 140 Hz. For an organism whose auditory receivers are separated by only 660±51 μm (mean ± s.d.), this inter-antennal velocity difference is far greater than differences in intensity observed between tympanal ears for organisms of similar scale. Further, the mechanical sensitivity of the antennae changes as a function of the angle of incidence of the acoustic stimulus, with peak responses along axes at 45 and 315 deg relative to the longitudinal body axis. This work indicates not only that the flies are able to detect differential cues in signal direction, but also that the male song structure may not be the sole determinant of mating success; his spatial positioning is also crucial to female sound reception and therefore also perhaps to her decision making.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, even without tests the completeness and accuracy of articles in Wikipedia tends to increase over time as users detect and correct omissions or errors in articles; Wikipedia is approximately as accurate as traditional encyclopedias 56.”
From FlyWire: online community for whole-brain connectomics (2022) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
Schlichting, H., & Gersten, K. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85829-1 · Cited by 18,700
The Biology of Mosquitoes, Volume 2: Sensory Reception and Behaviour
Clements, A. N. (1999) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851993133.0000 · Cited by 494
Pulse interval as a critical parameter in the courtship song of Drosophila melanogaster
Bennet-Clark, H. C., & Ewing, A. W. (1969) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(69)80023-0 · Cited by 295
The Courtship Songs of Drosophila
Ewing, A. W., & Bennet-Clark, H. C. (1968) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853968x00298 · Cited by 256
The role of auditory stimuli in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster
von Schilcher, F. (1976) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(76)80095-4 · Cited by 232
The Boundary Layer of Swimming Fish
Anderson, E. J., Mcgillis, W. R., & Grosenbaugh, M. A. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.204.1.81 · Cited by 227
The function of pulse song and sine song in the courtship of Drosophila melanogaster
Schilcher, F. V. (1976) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(76)80076-0 · Cited by 206
Shimozawa, T., & Kanou, M. (1984) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00611913 · Cited by 195
(2005) · Springer Handbook of Auditory Research · doi:10.1007/0-387-28863-5 · Cited by 185
BENNET-CLARK, H. C. (1971) · Nature · doi:10.1038/234255a0 · Cited by 176
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Jonsson T. (2012). Analysis of behaviour, acoustics, and communication during courtship in Drosophila melanogaster. PhD thesis, University of Bristol.
Cited by
FlyWire: online community for whole-brain connectomics
Dorkenwald, S., McKellar, C. E., Macrina, T., Kemnitz, N., Lee, K., Lu, R., Wu, J., Popovych, S., Mitchell, E., Nehoran, B., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01330-0 · Cited by 289
Functional Maps of Mechanosensory Features in the Drosophila Brain
Patella, P., & Wilson, R. I. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.074 · Cited by 92
Neural network organization for courtship-song feature detection in Drosophila
Baker, C. A., McKellar, C., Pang, R., Nern, A., Dorkenwald, S., Pacheco, D. A., Eckstein, N., Funke, J., Dickson, B. J., & Murthy, M. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.019 · Cited by 57
Matsuo, E., Seki, H., Asai, T., Morimoto, T., Miyakawa, H., Ito, K., & Kamikouchi, A. (2016) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.23955 · Cited by 56
Active mechanisms of vibration encoding and frequency filtering in central mechanosensory neurons
Azevedo, A. W., & Wilson, R. I. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.004 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Morley, E. L., Steinmann, T., Casas, J., & Robert, D.
- Affiliations
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
- Institut de Recherches sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, University of Tours, UMR CNRS 6035, 37200 Tours, France
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2012-07-15
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2405-2413
- ISSN
- 1477-9145
- 0022-0949
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 40
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Directional cues in Drosophila melanogaster audition: structure of acoustic flow and inter-antennal velocity differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.068940
- The paper
- Morley, E. L., Steinmann, T., Casas, J., & Robert, D. (2012). Directional cues in Drosophila melanogaster audition: structure of acoustic flow and inter-antennal velocity differences. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.068940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.