Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Directional cues in Drosophila melanogaster audition: structure of acoustic flow and inter-antennal velocity differences

Morley, Erica L., Steinmann, Thomas, Casas, Jérôme, Robert, Daniel·2012·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Drosophila melanogaster have bilateral antisymmetric antennae that receive the particle velocity component of an acoustic stimulus. Acoustic communication is important in their courtship, which takes place in the acoustic near-field. Here, the small size of the dipole sound source (the male wing) and the rapid attenuation rate of particle velocity produce a spatially divergent sound field with highly variable magnitude. Also, male and female D. melanogaster are not usually stationary during courtship, resulting in a variable directionality of the acoustic stimulus. Using both particle image velocimetry and laser Doppler vibrometry, we examined the stimulus flow around the head of D. melanogaster to identify the actual geometry of the acoustic input to the antennae and its directional response. We reveal that the stimulus changes in both magnitude and direction as a function of its angle of incidence. Remarkably, directionality is substantial, with inter-antennal velocity differences of 25 dB at 140 Hz. For an organism whose auditory receivers are separated by only 660±51 μm (mean ± s.d.), this inter-antennal velocity difference is far greater than differences in intensity observed between tympanal ears for organisms of similar scale. Further, the mechanical sensitivity of the antennae changes as a function of the angle of incidence of the acoustic stimulus, with peak responses along axes at 45 and 315 deg relative to the longitudinal body axis. This work indicates not only that the flies are able to detect differential cues in signal direction, but also that the male song structure may not be the sole determinant of mating success; his spatial positioning is also crucial to female sound reception and therefore also perhaps to her decision making.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.068940

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Jonsson T. (2012). Analysis of behaviour, acoustics, and communication during courtship in Drosophila melanogaster. PhD thesis, University of Bristol.

Cited by

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Morley, E. L., Steinmann, T., Casas, J., & Robert, D.
Affiliations
  • School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK
  • Institut de Recherches sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, University of Tours, UMR CNRS 6035, 37200 Tours, France
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2012-07-15
Volume
215
Issue
14
Pages
2405-2413
ISSN
  • 1477-9145
  • 0022-0949
Cited by
43
References
40
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Directional cues in Drosophila melanogaster audition: structure of acoustic flow and inter-antennal velocity differences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.068940
The paper
Morley, E. L., Steinmann, T., Casas, J., & Robert, D. (2012). Directional cues in Drosophila melanogaster audition: structure of acoustic flow and inter-antennal velocity differences. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.068940

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.