Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 227

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Boundary Layer of Swimming Fish

Anderson, Erik J., Mcgillis, Wade R., Grosenbaugh, Mark A.·2001·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Tangential and normal velocity profiles of the boundary layer surrounding live swimming fish were determined by digital particle tracking velocimetry, DPTV. Two species were examined: the scup Stenotomus chrysops, a carangiform swimmer, and the smooth dogfish Mustelus canis, an anguilliform swimmer. Measurements were taken at several locations over the surfaces of the fish and throughout complete undulatory cycles of their propulsive motions. The Reynolds number based on length, Re, ranged from 3×103 to 3×105. In general, boundary layer profiles were found to match known laminar and turbulent profiles including those of Blasius, Falkner and Skan and the law of the wall. In still water, boundary layer profile shape always suggested laminar flow. In flowing water, boundary layer profile shape suggested laminar flow at lower Reynolds numbers and turbulent flow at the highest Reynolds numbers. In some cases, oscillation between laminar and turbulent profile shapes with body phase was observed. Local friction coefficients, boundary layer thickness and fluid velocities at the edge of the boundary layer were suggestive of local oscillatory and mean streamwise acceleration of the boundary layer. The behavior of these variables differed significantly in the boundary layer over a rigid fish. Total skin friction was determined. Swimming fish were found to experience greater friction drag than the same fish stretched straight in the flow. Nevertheless, the power necessary to overcome friction drag was determined to be within previous experimentally measured power outputs. No separation of the boundary layer was observed around swimming fish, suggesting negligible form drag. Inflected boundary layers, suggestive of incipient separation, were observed sporadically, but appeared to be stabilized at later phases of the undulatory cycle. These phenomena may be evidence of hydrodynamic sensing and response towards the optimization of swimming performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.204.1.81

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, E. J., Mcgillis, W. R., & Grosenbaugh, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
204
Issue
1
Pages
81-102
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2122196253
Cited by
227
References
1
FWCI
17.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Boundary Layer of Swimming Fish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.204.1.81
The paper
Anderson, E. J., Mcgillis, W. R., & Grosenbaugh, M. A. (2001). The Boundary Layer of Swimming Fish. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.204.1.81

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.