The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Boundary Layer of Swimming Fish
Abstract
Tangential and normal velocity profiles of the boundary layer surrounding live swimming fish were determined by digital particle tracking velocimetry, DPTV. Two species were examined: the scup Stenotomus chrysops, a carangiform swimmer, and the smooth dogfish Mustelus canis, an anguilliform swimmer. Measurements were taken at several locations over the surfaces of the fish and throughout complete undulatory cycles of their propulsive motions. The Reynolds number based on length, Re, ranged from 3×103 to 3×105. In general, boundary layer profiles were found to match known laminar and turbulent profiles including those of Blasius, Falkner and Skan and the law of the wall. In still water, boundary layer profile shape always suggested laminar flow. In flowing water, boundary layer profile shape suggested laminar flow at lower Reynolds numbers and turbulent flow at the highest Reynolds numbers. In some cases, oscillation between laminar and turbulent profile shapes with body phase was observed. Local friction coefficients, boundary layer thickness and fluid velocities at the edge of the boundary layer were suggestive of local oscillatory and mean streamwise acceleration of the boundary layer. The behavior of these variables differed significantly in the boundary layer over a rigid fish. Total skin friction was determined. Swimming fish were found to experience greater friction drag than the same fish stretched straight in the flow. Nevertheless, the power necessary to overcome friction drag was determined to be within previous experimentally measured power outputs. No separation of the boundary layer was observed around swimming fish, suggesting negligible form drag. Inflected boundary layers, suggestive of incipient separation, were observed sporadically, but appeared to be stabilized at later phases of the undulatory cycle. These phenomena may be evidence of hydrodynamic sensing and response towards the optimization of swimming performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle-Imaging Techniques for Experimental Fluid Mechanics
Adrian, R. J. (1991) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fl.23.010191.001401 · Cited by 3,405
Cited by
A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows
Liao, J. C. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2082 · Cited by 834
PASSIVE AND ACTIVE FLOW CONTROL BY SWIMMING FISHES AND MAMMALS
Fish, F. E., & Lauder, G. V. (2006) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092201 · Cited by 817
Borazjani, I., & Sotiropoulos, F. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.015644 · Cited by 512
Optimal Strouhal number for swimming animals
Eloy, C. (2012) · Journal of Fluids and Structures · doi:10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.02.008 · Cited by 306
Borazjani, I., & Sotiropoulos, F. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.025007 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, E. J., Mcgillis, W. R., & Grosenbaugh, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-102
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2122196253
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Boundary Layer of Swimming Fish. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.204.1.81
- The paper
- Anderson, E. J., Mcgillis, W. R., & Grosenbaugh, M. A. (2001). The Boundary Layer of Swimming Fish. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.204.1.81
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.