Cited by 53Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Navigation by environmental geometry: The use of zebrafish as a model

Open access
Lee, Sang Ah, Vallortigara, Giorgio, Flore, Michele, Spelke, Elizabeth, Sovrano, Valeria A.·2013·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Sensitivity to environmental shape in spatial navigation has been found, at both behavioural and neural levels, in virtually every species tested, starting early in development. Moreover, evidence that genetic deletions can cause selective deficits in such navigation behaviours suggests a genetic basis to navigation by environmental geometry. Nevertheless, the geometric computations underlying navigation have not been specified in any species. The present study teases apart the geometric components within the traditionally used rectangular enclosure and finds that zebrafish selectively represent distance and directional relationships between extended boundary surfaces. Similar behavioural results in geometric navigation tasks with human children provide prima facie evidence for similar underlying cognitive computations and open new doors for probing the genetic foundations that give rise to these computations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.088625

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of studies have demonstrated that teleost fish can rely on the geometry or global shape of the environmental boundaries and surfaces for orientation and navigation.

    “a number of studies have demonstrated also that teleost fish can rely on the geometry or global shape of the environmental boundaries and surfaces for orientation and navigation”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [84]

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 53

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Barry, 2006, The boundary vector cell model of place cell firing and spatial memory, Rev. Neurosci., 17, 71, 10.1515/REVNEURO.2006.17.1-2.71 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Biederman, 1991, Priming contour-deleted images: evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition, Cognit. Psychol., 23, 393, 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90014-F · DOI
  3. Cheng, 1986, A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation, Cognition, 23, 149, 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90041-7 · DOI
  4. Cheng, 2005, Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 12, 1, 10.3758/BF03196346 · DOI
  5. Dubnau, 1998, Gene discovery in Drosophila: new insights for learning and memory, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 21, 407, 10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.407 · DOI
  6. Gallistel, 2009, The importance of proving the null, Psychol. Rev., 116, 439, 10.1037/a0015251 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gallistel, 2013, The neuroscience of learning: beyond the Hebbian synapse, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 64, 169, 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143807 · DOI
  8. Garrison, 2012, Oxytocin/vasopressin-related peptides have an ancient role in reproductive behavior, Science, 338, 540, 10.1126/science.1226201 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gouteux, 2001, Children's use of geometry and landmarks to reorient in an open space, Cognition, 81, 119, 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00128-7 · DOI
  10. Guo, 2004, Linking genes to brain, behavior and neurological diseases: what can we learn from zebrafish?, Genes Brain Behav., 3, 63, 10.1046/j.1601-183X.2003.00053.x · DOI
  11. Hermer, 1994, A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children, Nature, 370, 57, 10.1038/370057a0 · DOI
  12. Huang, 2013, Core knowledge and the emergence of symbols: the case of maps, J. Cogn. Dev.
  13. Kerr, 1963, Grouping behaviour of the zebrafish as influenced by social isolation, Am. Zool., 2, 532
  14. Lakusta, 2010, Impaired geometric reorientation caused by genetic defect, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 2813, 10.1073/pnas.0909155107 · DOI
  15. Lee, 2008, Children's use of geometry for reorientation, Dev. Sci., 11, 743, 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00724.x · DOI
  16. Lee, 2010, A modular geometric mechanism for reorientation in children, Cogn. Psychol., 61, 152, 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.002 · DOI
  17. Lee, 2011, Young children reorient by computing layout geometry, not by matching images of the environment, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 18, 192, 10.3758/s13423-010-0035-z · DOI
  18. Lee, 2012, Navigation as a source of geometric knowledge: young children's use of length, angle, distance, and direction in a reorientation task, Cognition, 123, 144, 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.12.015 · DOI
  19. Lee, 2012, Chicks, like children, spontaneously reorient by three-dimensional environmental geometry, not by image matching, Biol. Lett., 8, 492, 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0067 · DOI
  20. Lee, 2012, Independent effects of geometry and landmark in a spontaneous reorientation task: a study of two species of fish, Anim. Cogn., 15, 861, 10.1007/s10071-012-0512-z · DOI
  21. Lever, 2009, Boundary vector cells in the subiculum of the hippocampal formation, J. Neurosci., 29, 9771, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1319-09.2009 · DOI · Paper page
  22. McGregor, 2006, Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005), J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process., 32, 314, 10.1037/0097-7403.32.3.314 · DOI
  23. Pearce, 2001, Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment, J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process., 27, 329, 10.1037/0097-7403.27.4.329 · DOI
  24. Pearce, 2004, Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning, J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process., 30, 135, 10.1037/0097-7403.30.2.135 · DOI
  25. Pecchia, 2010, View-based strategy for reorientation by geometry, J. Exp. Biol., 213, 2987, 10.1242/jeb.043315 · DOI
  26. Pecchia, 2012, Spatial reorientation by geometry with freestanding objects and extended surfaces: a unifying view, Proc. Biol. Sci., 279, 2228
  27. Solstad, 2008, Representation of geometric borders in the entorhinal cortex, Science, 322, 1865, 10.1126/science.1166466 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Sovrano, 2008, Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish, Anim. Cogn., 11, 161, 10.1007/s10071-007-0100-9 · DOI
  29. Sovrano, 2003, Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation, J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process., 29, 199, 10.1037/0097-7403.29.3.199 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Spelke, 2012, Core system of geometry in animal minds, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B, 367, 2784, 10.1098/rstb.2012.0210 · DOI
  31. Tommasi, 2012, From natural geometry to spatial cognition, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 36, 799, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.12.007 · DOI
  32. Vallortigara, 2009, Animals as natural geometers, 83, 10.7551/mitpress/9780262012935.003.0081 · DOI
  33. Wang, 1999, Mechanisms of reorientation and object localization by children: a comparison with rats, Behav. Neurosci., 113, 475, 10.1037/0735-7044.113.3.475 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lee, S. A., Vallortigara, G., Flore, M., Spelke, E., & Sovrano, V. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Trento;
  • University of Trento (IT)
Corresponding author
Lee, Sang Ah
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
216
Issue
Pt 19
Pages
3693-9
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2128130002
Cited by
53
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Keywords
environmental geometry, spatial navigation, zebrafish, distance representation, boundary geometry, geometric computation, cognitive development, rectangular enclosure
MeSH terms
Animals, Child, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Orientation, Space Perception, Spatial Behavior, Zebrafish

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review