Body drag, feather drag and interference drag of the mounting strut in a peregrine falcon, Falco Peregrinus
Abstract
ABSTRACT The mean, minimum drag coefficients (CD,B) of a frozen, wingless peregrine falcon body and a smooth-surfaced model of the body were 0.24 and 0.14, respectively, at air speeds between 10.0 and 14.5 ms−1. These values were measured with a drag balance in a wind tunnel, and use the maximum crosssectional area of the body as a reference area. The difference between the values indicates the effect of the feathers on body drag. Both values for CD,B are lower than those predicted from most other studies of avian body drag, which yield estimates of CD,B up to 0.41. Several factors must be controlled to measure minimum drag on a frozen body. These include the condition of the feathers, the angle of the head and tail relative to the direction of air flow, and the interference drag generated by the drag balance and the strut on which the body is mounted. This study describes techniques for measuring the interference drag generated by (a) the drag balance and mounting strut together and (b) the mounting strut alone. Corrections for interference drag may reduce the apparent body drag by more than 20 %. A gliding Harris’ hawk (Parabuteo unicinctus), which has a body similar to that of the falcon in size and proportions, has an estimated body drag coefficient of 0.18. This value can be used to compute the profile drag coefficients of Harris’ hawk wings when combined with data for this species in the adjoining paper (Tucker and Heine, 1990).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the flight phase up to 240 km/h, the front part of the wings have a cupped-like profile.
“This is followed by a tight vertical tuck of the wings up to speeds of 240 km h−1. In this flight phase the front part of the wings have a cupped-like profile [14], [15], [16], [9].”
From Diving-Flight Aerodynamics of a Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus) (2014) · cites this paper as [16]
During the stoop, peregrine falcons (Falco peregrinus) can reach velocities of up to 320 km h-1.
“During the stoop of peregrine falcons ( Falco peregrinus ) they can reach velocities of up to 320 km h -1 .”
From Morphological properties of the last primaries, the tail feathers, and the alulae of <scp><i>A</i></scp><i>ccipiter nisus</i>, <scp><i>C</i></scp><i>olumba livia</i>, <scp><i>F</i></scp><i>alco peregrinus</i>, and <scp><i>F</i></scp><i>alco tinnunculus</i> (2015) · cites this paper as Tucker, 1990
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Tucker, V. A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tucker, Vance A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1990-03-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 449-468
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2344439167
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid dynamics and aerodynamics studies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
- Keywords
- Falco peregrinus, body drag, interference drag, drag coefficient, Harris's hawk, Parabuteo unicinctus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review