The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Local and General Factors in the Development of “Pattern” in Rhodnius Prolixus (Hemiptera)
Abstract
Most studies on morphogenesis have been made upon composite structures, such as eyes or appendages, whose form is controlled by the co-operation of a great number of cells. In insects, however, the tiny fragment of cuticle laid down by a single cell may possess morphological characters controlled by the activities of that cell alone. The cuticle of insects provides, therefore, an unusually simple medium for the study of morphogenesis and the nature of those processes which “determine” the activity of a given cell.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The developmental biology of Dishevelled: an enigmatic protein governing cell fate and cell polarity
Wallingford, J. B., & Habas, R. (2005) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.02068 · Cited by 509
The control of trichome spacing and number in Arabidopsis
Larkin, J. C., Young, N., Prigge, M., & Marks, M. D. (1996) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.122.3.997 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Wigglesworth, V. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1940-04-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-201
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W1928215480
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local and General Factors in the Development of “Pattern” in Rhodnius Prolixus (Hemiptera). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.17.2.180
- The paper
- Wigglesworth, V. B. (1940). Local and General Factors in the Development of “Pattern” in Rhodnius Prolixus (Hemiptera). Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.17.2.180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
