Cited by 12Robotic Locomotion and ControlAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetry

Waddle and shuffle: gait alterations associated with domestication in turkeys

Open access
Stover, Kristin K., Brainerd, Elizabeth L., Roberts, Thomas J.·2018·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Domestication has altered turkey morphology by artificially selecting for increased muscle mass and breast meat. Artificial selection has resulted in birds that weigh up to three times more than their wild counterparts, with relatively little change in the length of their bones and limbs. Considering these structural changes, it seems probable that domestic turkey locomotor kinematics and kinetics would also be altered. To examine the locomotor dynamics of wild and domestic turkeys we had both strains walk down a runway with a force plate at the center to measure their ground reaction forces and gait parameters. The location of their center of mass was also quantified using a force plate and bi-planar x-ray and found to be further anterior in the domestic strain. The domestic turkeys locomoted across a lower range of speeds (0.25-1.64 ms−1) than the wild turkeys (0.26-3.26 ms−1) and increased their stride frequency at a higher rate. They also displayed large lateral oscillations, i.e. waddling, during walking that translated into relatively high medio-lateral ground reaction forces and lateral kinetic energy (3.5 times higher than wild turkeys). Results indicate that domestic turkey locomotion is not simply a slowed down version of wild turkey locomotion. The changes in gait observed are similar to the shuffling gait present in some human populations, such as Parkinson's patients, which serves to increase stability. The domestic turkey's increased body mass and more anterior center of mass position may require these kinematic and kinetic gait differences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.180687

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This may explain the reduced locomotion ability, including flying, in domesticated poultry.

    “This may explain the reduced locomotion ability (including flying) in domesticated poultry (Wang et al. 2017; Stover et al. 2018).”

    From Genomic Analyses Unveil Helmeted Guinea Fowl (<i>Numida meleagris</i>) Domestication in West Africa (2021) · cites this paper as Stover et al. 2018

    The Concluding remarks (page unavailable) link increased body mass in domestic turkeys to altered gait and a lower speed range than wild turkeys. The paper studies walking, not flying, and does not establish reduced flight ability across domesticated poultry. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Neeteson A.-M., McAdam J., Swalander M. and Koerhuis A. (2016). Decades of Welfare and Sustainability Selection at Aviagen: Chickens and Turkeys. Aviagen Group; http://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Broiler_Breeder_Tech_Articles/English/AviagenBrief-DecadesOfWelfare-2016-EN.pdf. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stover, K. K., Brainerd, E. L., & Roberts, T. J.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Roberts, Thomas J.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
221
Issue
Pt 15
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2810604206
Cited by
12
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (AR055295)
  • National Science Foundation (IOS-1354289)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
gait, locomotion, shuffling gait, center of mass, ground reaction force, cadence, selective breeding, locomotor stability, Parkinson's disease
MeSH terms
Domestication, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Body Weight, Female, Gait, Kinetics, Male, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Turkeys, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review