The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Kinematics of Birdsong: Functional Correlation of Cranial Movements and Acoustic Features in Sparrows
Abstract
The movements of the head and beak of songbirds may play a functional role in vocal production by influencing the acoustic properties of songs. We investigated this possibility by synchronously measuring the acoustic frequency and amplitude and the kinematics (beak gape and head angle) of singing behavior in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) and the swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana). These birds are closely related emberizine sparrows, but their songs differ radically in frequency and amplitude structure. We found that the acoustic frequencies of notes in a song have a consistent, positive correlation with beak gape in both species. Beak gape increased significantly with increasing frequency during the first two notes in Z. albicollis song, with a mean frequency for note 1 of 3kHz corresponding to a gape of 0.4cm (a 15° gape angle) and a mean frequency for note 2 of 4kHz corresponding to a gape of 0.7cm (a 30° gape angle). The relationship between gape and frequency for the upswept third note in Z. albicollis also was significant. In M. georgiana, low frequencies of 3kHz corresponded to beak gapes of 0.2–0.3 cm (a 10–15° beak angle), whereas frequencies of 7–8kHz were associated with flaring of the beak to over 1cm (a beak angle greater than 50°). Beak gape and song amplitude are poorly correlated in both species. We conclude that cranial kinematics, particularly beak movements, influence the resonance properties of the vocal tract by varying its physical dimensions and thus play an active role in the production of birdsong.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms
Doupe, A. J., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.22.1.567 · Cited by 1,633
Temporal Hierarchical Control of Singing in Birds
Yu, A. C., & Margoliash, D. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5283.1871 · Cited by 608
Fitch, W. T. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511817779 · Cited by 594
Song Function and the Evolution of Female Preferences: Why Birds Sing, Why Brains Matter
NOWICKI, S., & SEARCY, W. A. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1298.012 · Cited by 230
Self-citationEcological drivers of song evolution in birds: Disentangling the effects of habitat and morphology
Derryberry, E. P., Seddon, N., Derryberry, G. E., Claramunt, S., Seeholzer, G. F., Brumfield, R. T., & Tobias, J. A. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.3760 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Westneat, M. W., Long, J. H., Hoese, W., & Nowicki, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-171
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W1899169209
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinematics of Birdsong: Functional Correlation of Cranial Movements and Acoustic Features in Sparrows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.182.1.147
- The paper
- Westneat, M. W., Long, J. H., Hoese, W., & Nowicki, S. (1993). Kinematics of Birdsong: Functional Correlation of Cranial Movements and Acoustic Features in Sparrows. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.182.1.147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.