The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physiological Mechanisms of Evolved Desiccation Resistance in Drosophila Melanogaster
Abstract
We investigated physiological characters associated with water balance in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for resistance to desiccating conditions for over 100 generations. Five replicate, outbred, desiccation-selected (D) populations were compared with their control (C) populations. Water loss rates of female D flies were approximately 40 % lower than those of C females. Although excretory water loss was reduced in desiccation-selected flies, it comprised less than 10 % of total water loss, indicating that the D populations have evolved reduced cuticular and/or respiratory water loss rates. Total surface lipid amounts did not differ between the C and D flies. Cuticular hydrocarbons from D flies were longer than those from C flies and melted at slightly higher temperatures, possibly contributing to reduced water loss rates. Desiccation-selected flies contained approximately 30 % more bulk water than controls, as well as more glycogen. However, total metabolic water stores did not differ between the stocks owing to higher lipid levels in the C populations. The ability to tolerate water loss, as measured by water content at the time of death, did not differ between D and C flies. Thus, evolution of increased desiccation resistance has occurred by multiple physiological mechanisms, but some potential adaptive differences have not evolved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid evolution in response to high-temperature selection
Bennett, A. F., Dao, K. M., & Lenski, R. E. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346079a0 · Cited by 182
Cited by
Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us?
Harshman, L. G., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2000) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01756-5 · Cited by 256
Desiccation tolerance in Anopheles coluzzii: the effects of spiracle size and cuticular hydrocarbons
Arcaz, A. C., Huestis, D. L., Dao, A., Yaro, A. S., Diallo, M., Andersen, J., Blomquist, G. J., & Lehmann, T. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.135665 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Gibbs, A. G., Chippindale, A. K., & Rose, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-06-15
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1821-1832
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2136890311
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological Mechanisms of Evolved Desiccation Resistance in Drosophila Melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.200.12.1821
- The paper
- Gibbs, A. G., Chippindale, A. K., & Rose, M. R. (1997). Physiological Mechanisms of Evolved Desiccation Resistance in Drosophila Melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.200.12.1821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.