Colour vision of domestic chicks
Abstract
The colour vision of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) was investigated by training them to small food containers decorated with tilings of grey and coloured rectangles. Chicks learn to recognise the colour quickly and accurately. Chicks have four types of single-cone photoreceptor sensitive to ultraviolet, short-, medium- or long-wavelength light. To establish how these receptors are used for colour vision, stimuli were designed to be distinguished only by specific combinations of receptors. We infer (1) that all four single cones are used, and (2) that their outputs are encoded by at least three opponency mechanisms: one comparing the outputs of ultraviolet- and short-wavelength-sensitive receptors, one comparing the outputs of medium- and long-wavelength receptors and a third comparing of the outputs of short- and long- and/or medium-wavelength receptors. Thus, the chicks have tetrachromatic colour vision. These experiments do not exclude a role for the fifth cone type, double cones, but other evidence suggests that these cones serve luminance-based tasks, such as motion detection, and not colour recognition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Chicks have tetrachromatic color vision.
“Chicks are a good animal model for the role of color in emmetropization because they have tetrachromatic color vision (Osorio, Vorobyev, & Jones, 1999).”
From Chicks use changes in luminance and chromatic contrast as indicators of the sign of defocus (2012) · cites this paper as Osorio, Vorobyev, & Jones, 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock
Loyau, A., Gomez, D., Moureau, B., Théry, M., Hart, N. S., Jalme, M. S., Bennett, A. T. D., & Sorci, G. (2007) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arm088 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Chicks use changes in luminance and chromatic contrast as indicators of the sign of defocus
Rucker, F. J., & Wallman, J. (2012) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/12.6.23 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Osorio, D., Vorobyev, M., & Jones, C. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 202
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2951-2959
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2126170323
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Color perception and design
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Color Science and Applications
- Keywords
- color vision, domestic chicks, tetrachromacy, UV sensitivity, color recognition, double cones, avian visual system
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Chickens, Color Perception, Humans, Photoreceptor Cells, Ultraviolet Rays, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review