The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vocal Tract Function in Birdsong Production: Experimental Manipulation of Beak Movements
Open accessAbstract
Kinematic analyses have demonstrated that the extent to which a songbird’s beak is open when singing correlates with the acoustic frequencies of the sounds produced, suggesting that beak movements function to modulate the acoustic properties of the vocal tract during song production. If motions of the beak are necessary for normal song production, then disrupting the ability of a bird to perform these movements should alter the acoustic properties of its song. We tested this prediction by comparing songs produced normally by white-throated sparrows and swamp sparrows with songs produced when the beak was temporarily immobilized. We also observed how temporarily loading the beak of canaries with extra mass affected vocal tract movements and song production. Disruption of vocal tract movements resulted in the predicted frequency-dependent amplitude changes in the songs of both white-throated sparrows and swamp sparrows. Canaries with mass added to their beak sang with their beak open more widely than normal and produced notes with greater harmonic content than those without weights. Both manipulations resulted in acoustic changes consistent with a model in which beak motions affect vocal tract resonances, thus supporting the hypothesis that dynamic vocal tract motions and post-production modulation of sound are necessary features of normal song production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Speech Analysis Synthesis and Perception
Flanagan, J. L. (1972) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-01562-9 · Cited by 1,469
Cited by
ECOLOGICAL ADAPTATION AND SPECIES RECOGNITION DRIVES VOCAL EVOLUTION IN NEOTROPICAL SUBOSCINE BIRDS
Seddon, N. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00906.x · Cited by 353
Song Function and the Evolution of Female Preferences: Why Birds Sing, Why Brains Matter
NOWICKI, S., & SEARCY, W. A. (2004) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1298.012 · Cited by 230
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoese, W. J., Podos, J., Boetticher, N. C., & Nowicki, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2000-06-15
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1845-1855
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2141635213
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vocal Tract Function in Birdsong Production: Experimental Manipulation of Beak Movements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.203.12.1845
- The paper
- Hoese, W. J., Podos, J., Boetticher, N. C., & Nowicki, S. (2000). Vocal Tract Function in Birdsong Production: Experimental Manipulation of Beak Movements. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.203.12.1845
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.