The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Catarrhine Photopigments are Optimized for Detecting Targets Against a Foliage Background
Abstract
The colour vision of many primates is trichromatic, whereas that of all other mammals is thought to be dichromatic or monochromatic. Moreover, the triplets of cone pigments in different catarrhines (Old World apes and monkeys) are strikingly similar in their spectral positions. We ask whether the selective advantage of trichromacy lies in an enhanced ability to find edible leaves or fruit. Further, we ask whether any factor in these two search tasks has constrained the particular set of cone spectral sensitivities observed in all catarrhines. We measured the spectral properties of the natural environments of six primate species in Uganda: Pan troglodytes, Cercopithecus mitis, Cercopithecus ascanius, Lophocebus albigena, Colobus guereza and Colobus badius. We concentrated on the fruit and leaves in their diets and the leaves of the trees that make up the background against which these diet items must be found. We plotted these measured stimuli in colour spaces appropriate for each primate species, and found that both frugivory and folivory are facilitated by the extra dimension of colour vision found in catarrhines but lacking in most other mammals. Furthermore, by treating the task of searching for food as a signal-detection task, we show that, of all possible combinations of cone sensitivities, the spectral positions of the actual primate pigments are optimal for finding fruit or young leaves against the background of mature leaves. This is because the variance of the chromaticities of the mature leaves is minimised in one channel of the primate’s colour vision, so allowing anything that is not a mature leaf to stand out.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of colour vision in vertebrates
Bowmaker, J. K. (1998) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.1998.143 · Cited by 239
Cited by
Animal colour vision — behavioural tests and physiological concepts
KELBER, A., VOROBYEV, M., & OSORIO, D. (2003) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793102005985 · Cited by 893
Using digital photography to study animal coloration: USING CAMERAS TO STUDY ANIMAL COLORATION
STEVENS, M., PÁRRAGA, C. A., CUTHILL, I. C., PARTRIDGE, J. C., & TROSCIANKO, T. S. (2007) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00725.x · Cited by 655
Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision
Regan, B. C., Julliot, C., Simmen, B., Viénot, F., Charles–Dominique, P., & Mollon, J. D. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0773 · Cited by 578
Self-citationEating with our eyes: From visual hunger to digital satiation
Spence, C., Okajima, K., Cheok, A. D., Petit, O., & Michel, C. (2016) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2015.08.006 · Cited by 522
Ecological importance of trichromatic vision to primates
Dominy, N. J., & Lucas, P. W. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35066567 · Cited by 493
Metadata
- Authors
- Sumner, P., & Mollon, J. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 203
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1963-1986
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2165834371
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Catarrhine Photopigments are Optimized for Detecting Targets Against a Foliage Background. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.203.13.1963
- The paper
- Sumner, P., & Mollon, J. D. (2000). Catarrhine Photopigments are Optimized for Detecting Targets Against a Foliage Background. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.203.13.1963
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.