The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Drosophila Melanogaster Homologue of an Insect Calcitonin-Like Diuretic Peptide Stimulates V-ATPase Activity in Fruit Fly Malpighian Tubules
Abstract
The Drosophila melanogaster homologue of an insect calcitonin-like diuretic hormone was identified in a BLAST search of the Drosophila genome database. The predicted 31-residue amidated peptide (D. melanogaster DH31; Drome-DH31) was synthesised and tested for activity on fruit fly Malpighian tubules. It increases tubule secretion by approximately 35 % of the response obtained with a myokinin from the housefly Musca domestica (muscakinin; Musdo-K) and has an EC50 of 4.3 nmol l−1. The diuretic activities of Drome-DH31 and Musdo-K were additive when tested at threshold and supra-maximal concentrations, which suggests that they target different transport processes. In support of this, Drome-DH31 increased the rate of secretion by tubules held in bathing fluid with a reduced Cl− concentration, whereas Musdo-K did so only in the presence of Drome-DH31. Stimulation with Drome-DH31 increased the lumen-positive transepithelial potential in the main secretory segment of the tubule. This was attributed to activation of an apical electrogenic proton-translocating V-ATPase in principal cells, since it was associated with hyperpolarisation of the apical membrane potential and acidification of secreted urine by 0.25 pH units. Exogenous 8-bromo-cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP increased tubule secretion to the same extent as Drome-DH31 and, when tested together with the diuretic peptide, their activities were not additive. Stimulation with Drome-DH31 resulted in a dose-dependent increase in cyclic AMP production by tubules incubated in saline containing 0.5 mmol l−1 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine, whereas cyclic GMP production was unchanged. Taken together, the data are consistent with Drome-DH31 activating an apical membrane V-ATPase via cyclic AMP. Since the K+ concentration of the secreted urine was unchanged, it is likely that Drome-DH31 has an equal effect on K+ and Na+ entry across the basolateral membrane.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nässel, D. R. (2002) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(02)00057-6 · Cited by 481
Recent advances in neuropeptide signaling in Drosophila, from genes to physiology and behavior
Nässel, D. R., & Zandawala, M. (2019) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.02.003 · Cited by 355
Hay, D. L., Poyner, D. R., & Sexton, P. M. (2006) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.06.015 · Cited by 239
Denholm (2013) · doi:10.4161/org.24107 · Cited by 48
Nässel, D. R. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22041940 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Coast, G. M., Webster, S. G., Schegg, K. M., Tobe, S. S., & Schooley, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2001-05-15
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1795-1804
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2188282925
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Drosophila Melanogaster Homologue of an Insect Calcitonin-Like Diuretic Peptide Stimulates V-ATPase Activity in Fruit Fly Malpighian Tubules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.204.10.1795
- The paper
- Coast, G. M., Webster, S. G., Schegg, K. M., Tobe, S. S., & Schooley, D. A. (2001). The Drosophila Melanogaster Homologue of an Insect Calcitonin-Like Diuretic Peptide Stimulates V-ATPase Activity in Fruit Fly Malpighian Tubules. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.204.10.1795
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.